Domenico Losurdo’s Nietzsche: Content and Context

Abstract Domenico Losurdo’s Nietzsche, the Aristocratic Rebel was a pioneering work in contextualising Nietzsche’s thought. Placing the content of his writings in the context of nineteenth-century politics and political theory, Losurdo corrected many errors in previous scholarship. He presents a more accurate account of Nietzsche’s early anti-Jewish proclivities and his later ambivalence toward Jews and Jewry. He also rectifies the misguided notion that Nietzsche’s sister Elisabeth was responsible for her brother’s reputation as a precursor of Nazism. But Losurdo’s exclusive focus on politics and political theory leads him to faulty accounts of Nietzsche’s views. Losurdo ignores many of the books that were most important for Nietzsche and assembles a context based on several works that Nietzsche had not read. What emerges is an incomplete, one-sided image of Nietzsche that is unable to fully explain Nietzsche’s conceptual universe. This underplays Nietzsche’s nuanced stance on social, political, and scientific issues of his times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Materialism
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-bja10065
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domenico Losurdo’s Nietzsche: Content and Context

Robert C. Holub
2 citations
Historical Materialism
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
34.53
article

Domenico Losurdo’s Nietzsche: Content and Context

Robert C. Holub
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Domenico Losurdo’s Nietzsche, the Aristocratic Rebel was a pioneering work in contextualising Nietzsche’s thought. Placing the content of his writings in the context of nineteenth-century politics and political theory, Losurdo corrected many errors in previous scholarship. He presents a more accurate account of Nietzsche’s early anti-Jewish proclivities and his later ambivalence toward Jews and Jewry. He also rectifies the misguided notion that Nietzsche’s sister Elisabeth was responsible for her brother’s reputation as a precursor of Nazism. But Losurdo’s exclusive focus on politics and political theory leads him to faulty accounts of Nietzsche’s views. Losurdo ignores many of the books that were most important for Nietzsche and assembles a context based on several works that Nietzsche had not read. What emerges is an incomplete, one-sided image of Nietzsche that is unable to fully explain Nietzsche’s conceptual universe. This underplays Nietzsche’s nuanced stance on social, political, and scientific issues of his times.

Historical MaterialismVol. 32(4)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.