Pregnancy Outcomes After Higher‐Order Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction: A Retrospective Study

Objective: To investigate the pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal or transabdominal fetal reduction for higher‐order multifetal pregnancies with four or more fetuses. Methods: This retrospective study included 102 patients with higher‐order multifetal pregnancies after ovulation induction. The patients underwent fetal reduction in the Reproductive Medical Center of Peking University Third Hospital from January 2000 to December 2020. Methods of fetal reduction included transvaginal and transabdominal reduction. Pregnancy outcomes of different methods were assessed, including the live birth rate, miscarriage rate, preterm labor rate, and low birthweight rate. Results: Among these 102 patients, 84 (82.4%) underwent transvaginal fetal reduction in early pregnancy, and 18 (17.6%) underwent transabdominal reduction in the second trimester. The live birth rate (66% vs. 78%, p = 0.311), preterm labor rate (24% vs. 33%, p = 0.587), and miscarriage rate (25% vs. 17%, p = 0.653) were comparable for transvaginal and transabdominal fetal reduction. Age, the method of fetal reduction, and the initial number and retained number of fetuses were not influencing factors of the live birth rate or miscarriage rate in these patients. Conclusion: Prevention is the most important measure to decrease the incidence of multiple pregnancies. For higher‐order multifetal pregnancies, multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) is considered a significant remedial measure. Transvaginal fetal reduction in the first trimester of pregnancy and transabdominal fetal reduction in the second trimester were both safe and effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijcp/2512443
Primary Topic
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pregnancy Outcomes After Higher‐Order Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction: A Retrospective Study

Jie Qiao, Dongwen Zheng, Yanyi Li, Ying Song et al.
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
article

Pregnancy Outcomes After Higher‐Order Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction: A Retrospective Study

Jie Qiao, Dongwen Zheng, Yanyi Li, Ying Song, Shuo Yang, Li Li, Hongxia Zhang, Rong Li, Liying Wang, Jia Li, Tian Tian, Caihong Ma, Di Sun, Rui Yang, Mengjie Fan, Ping Liu
article en

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal or transabdominal fetal reduction for higher‐order multifetal pregnancies with four or more fetuses. Methods: This retrospective study included 102 patients with higher‐order multifetal pregnancies after ovulation induction. The patients underwent fetal reduction in the Reproductive Medical Center of Peking University Third Hospital from January 2000 to December 2020. Methods of fetal reduction included transvaginal and transabdominal reduction. Pregnancy outcomes of different methods were assessed, including the live birth rate, miscarriage rate, preterm labor rate, and low birthweight rate. Results: Among these 102 patients, 84 (82.4%) underwent transvaginal fetal reduction in early pregnancy, and 18 (17.6%) underwent transabdominal reduction in the second trimester. The live birth rate (66% vs. 78%, p = 0.311), preterm labor rate (24% vs. 33%, p = 0.587), and miscarriage rate (25% vs. 17%, p = 0.653) were comparable for transvaginal and transabdominal fetal reduction. Age, the method of fetal reduction, and the initial number and retained number of fetuses were not influencing factors of the live birth rate or miscarriage rate in these patients. Conclusion: Prevention is the most important measure to decrease the incidence of multiple pregnancies. For higher‐order multifetal pregnancies, multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) is considered a significant remedial measure. Transvaginal fetal reduction in the first trimester of pregnancy and transabdominal fetal reduction in the second trimester were both safe and effective.

International Journal of Clinical PracticeVol. 2025(1)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), Peking University (CN), Reproductive Science Center (US), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College (CN), Chengde Medical University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Peking University, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.