Evaluation of antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies. The most recent practice guidelines, last updated in 2020, recommend using a mold-active azole or echinocandin when antifungal prophylaxis is warranted; however, there has historically been a lack of standardized prescribing practices at our institution. <h3>Objective</h3> This study's primary aim is to characterize our institution's current prescribing patterns by comparing the incidence of IFD among pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with or without antifungal prophylaxis. <h3>Methods</h3> This single-center, retrospective chart review evaluated patients with ALL or AML treated at Arkansas Children's Hospital from January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2023. Secondary analyses included evaluating IFD in high-risk patients, incidence of adverse events, and use of therapeutic drug monitoring. Descriptive statistics were calculated and statistical significance was determined using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 114 patients were included, with 54 patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole had a higher incidence of IFD than other prophylaxis agents and no prophylaxis (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Among high-risk patients, 62.9% received antifungal prophylaxis. There was a lower incidence of IFD in those who received mold-active prophylaxis than those who did not (17.4% vs. 35.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.03) and in those who received guideline-directed prophylaxis than those who received fluconazole prophylaxis (19.7% vs. 57.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). <h3>Conclusions</h3> We found considerable variability in prescribing practices at our institution, particularly among high-risk patients. In addition, patients who received fluconazole prophylaxis had a statistically significant higher incidence of fungal infections and elevated QTc than those who received other prophylaxis agents and no prophylaxis. Overall, this study highlights the importance of evaluating institutional practices and using guideline-based prophylaxis agents in children at high risk of IFD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JAPhA Practice Innovations
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100043
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia

Mary Kathryn Vance, Autumn Dawn Galbreath, Amanda L. Elchynski, Michael R. Odom et al.
JAPhA Practice Innovations
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

Evaluation of antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia

Mary Kathryn Vance, Autumn Dawn Galbreath, Amanda L. Elchynski, Michael R. Odom, Caleb McMinn, Arunkumar Modi
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies. The most recent practice guidelines, last updated in 2020, recommend using a mold-active azole or echinocandin when antifungal prophylaxis is warranted; however, there has historically been a lack of standardized prescribing practices at our institution. <h3>Objective</h3> This study's primary aim is to characterize our institution's current prescribing patterns by comparing the incidence of IFD among pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with or without antifungal prophylaxis. <h3>Methods</h3> This single-center, retrospective chart review evaluated patients with ALL or AML treated at Arkansas Children's Hospital from January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2023. Secondary analyses included evaluating IFD in high-risk patients, incidence of adverse events, and use of therapeutic drug monitoring. Descriptive statistics were calculated and statistical significance was determined using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 114 patients were included, with 54 patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole had a higher incidence of IFD than other prophylaxis agents and no prophylaxis (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Among high-risk patients, 62.9% received antifungal prophylaxis. There was a lower incidence of IFD in those who received mold-active prophylaxis than those who did not (17.4% vs. 35.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.03) and in those who received guideline-directed prophylaxis than those who received fluconazole prophylaxis (19.7% vs. 57.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). <h3>Conclusions</h3> We found considerable variability in prescribing practices at our institution, particularly among high-risk patients. In addition, patients who received fluconazole prophylaxis had a statistically significant higher incidence of fungal infections and elevated QTc than those who received other prophylaxis agents and no prophylaxis. Overall, this study highlights the importance of evaluating institutional practices and using guideline-based prophylaxis agents in children at high risk of IFD.

JAPhA Practice InnovationsVol. 2(3)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.