Stakeholders’ views on screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools

Background Identifying children with intellectual disability in mainstream schools has been described as a ‘postcode lottery’. Children with an intellectual disability may be at risk of being ‘hidden’ in schools because they are included in broader categories, such as having developmental disabilities. Aim To explore stakeholders’ views on the use of a screening tool for intellectual disability in mainstream schools. Method The study used semi-structured interviews to obtain the views of stakeholders about processes for identifying children with intellectual disabilities. The interviews involved six participants – healthcare and education professionals and a parent advocate and advisor – and the findings were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Two themes were identified: barriers to the identification of intellectual disability; and the role and impact of a screening tool and what is the point of it? Conclusion The findings suggest that screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools could provide a more consistent, evidence-based method of improving identification and helping to validate the concerns of parents and teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Disability Practice
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp.2025.e2267
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholders’ views on screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools

George Murray, Dale Metcalfe, Karen McKenzie
Learning Disability Practice
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Stakeholders’ views on screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools

George Murray, Dale Metcalfe, Karen McKenzie
article en

Abstract

Background Identifying children with intellectual disability in mainstream schools has been described as a ‘postcode lottery’. Children with an intellectual disability may be at risk of being ‘hidden’ in schools because they are included in broader categories, such as having developmental disabilities. Aim To explore stakeholders’ views on the use of a screening tool for intellectual disability in mainstream schools. Method The study used semi-structured interviews to obtain the views of stakeholders about processes for identifying children with intellectual disabilities. The interviews involved six participants – healthcare and education professionals and a parent advocate and advisor – and the findings were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Two themes were identified: barriers to the identification of intellectual disability; and the role and impact of a screening tool and what is the point of it? Conclusion The findings suggest that screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools could provide a more consistent, evidence-based method of improving identification and helping to validate the concerns of parents and teachers.

Learning Disability Practice
North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Northumbria University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.