Liberating students from epistemic injustice in academic misconduct processes by shifting to a more compassionate and inclusive approach

Academic misconduct processes in higher education institutions are supposed to ensure fairness. However, these very processes can lead to epistemic injustice (testimonial and hermeneutical) partly because students come from different epistemic cultures and so do not have a homogenised understanding of what constitutes academic misconduct. Understanding the many reasons for why students may turn to academic misconduct either deliberately or accidently is important to inform teaching practice. Learning development needs to guide students away from epistemic ignorance and potential epistemic injustice by actively involving and immersing students in good academic practice as well as focusing on the positives of critical thinking, objective analysis and reasons for why skills such as referencing are important as part of both respectful dialogue and intellectual growth. This would move away from a focus on negatives and punitive approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi35.1316
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liberating students from epistemic injustice in academic misconduct processes by shifting to a more compassionate and inclusive approach

Chloe Courtenay
Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Liberating students from epistemic injustice in academic misconduct processes by shifting to a more compassionate and inclusive approach

Chloe Courtenay
article en

Abstract

Academic misconduct processes in higher education institutions are supposed to ensure fairness. However, these very processes can lead to epistemic injustice (testimonial and hermeneutical) partly because students come from different epistemic cultures and so do not have a homogenised understanding of what constitutes academic misconduct. Understanding the many reasons for why students may turn to academic misconduct either deliberately or accidently is important to inform teaching practice. Learning development needs to guide students away from epistemic ignorance and potential epistemic injustice by actively involving and immersing students in good academic practice as well as focusing on the positives of critical thinking, objective analysis and reasons for why skills such as referencing are important as part of both respectful dialogue and intellectual growth. This would move away from a focus on negatives and punitive approaches.

Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education(35)
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Liberating students from epistemic injustice in academic misconduct processes by shifting to a more compassionate and inclusive approach — Chloe Courtenay · Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS