The Rise of Legislative Authoritarianism

Abstract: The literature has focused on executive aggrandizement as the path leading to autocratization. Therefore, dysfunctional relations between the executive and legislative branches were seen as a "blessing in disguise" which prevented presidents from becoming powerful enough to cause democratic backsliding. More recently, scholars have interpreted such dysfunctionality as a problem in the form of "democratic hollowing." Yet this may be only a transitory state of affairs. Power vacuums tend to be filled. Evidence shows that even fragmented groups in the legislative branch can concentrate power. This concentration of power defines another path to democratic backsliding via what we call legislative authoritarianism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of democracy
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2025.a954567
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
63.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rise of Legislative Authoritarianism

José Incio, Paolo Sosa‐Villagarcia, Moisés Arce
4 citations
Journal of democracy
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
63.94
article

The Rise of Legislative Authoritarianism

José Incio, Paolo Sosa‐Villagarcia, Moisés Arce
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The literature has focused on executive aggrandizement as the path leading to autocratization. Therefore, dysfunctional relations between the executive and legislative branches were seen as a "blessing in disguise" which prevented presidents from becoming powerful enough to cause democratic backsliding. More recently, scholars have interpreted such dysfunctionality as a problem in the form of "democratic hollowing." Yet this may be only a transitory state of affairs. Power vacuums tend to be filled. Evidence shows that even fragmented groups in the legislative branch can concentrate power. This concentration of power defines another path to democratic backsliding via what we call legislative authoritarianism.

Journal of democracyVol. 36(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
63.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.