How Autocrats Use Proxies to Control the Media

Abstract: There is growing awareness of how autocrats use propaganda to generate and sustain mass support, yet much of this attention focuses on the influence of directly state-owned media. This article shifts the spotlight to proxy-owned media—private outlets controlled by individuals with informal ties to autocratic regimes. In autocracies around the world, proxy media are on the rise, overtaking traditional state-run outlets as the most prevalent and far-reaching source of propaganda. Unlike state media, proxy outlets maintain a veneer of political independence, making them appear more trustworthy to skeptical audiences. This article highlights gaps in public knowledge about the true ownership of proxy outlets, explores how these gaps may make otherwise skeptical people more likely to consume and believe proregime news, and suggests ways journalists, activists, and the public can counter proxy media's influence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of democracy
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2025.a954566
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Autocrats Use Proxies to Control the Media

Bardia Rahmani
1 citations
Journal of democracy
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
article

How Autocrats Use Proxies to Control the Media

Bardia Rahmani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: There is growing awareness of how autocrats use propaganda to generate and sustain mass support, yet much of this attention focuses on the influence of directly state-owned media. This article shifts the spotlight to proxy-owned media—private outlets controlled by individuals with informal ties to autocratic regimes. In autocracies around the world, proxy media are on the rise, overtaking traditional state-run outlets as the most prevalent and far-reaching source of propaganda. Unlike state media, proxy outlets maintain a veneer of political independence, making them appear more trustworthy to skeptical audiences. This article highlights gaps in public knowledge about the true ownership of proxy outlets, explores how these gaps may make otherwise skeptical people more likely to consume and believe proregime news, and suggests ways journalists, activists, and the public can counter proxy media's influence.

Journal of democracyVol. 36(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.