Vuk and Kant: What is enlightenment?

V. S. Karadzic?s legacy was often interpreted in the light of its relationship with different intellectual movements at the end of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century: Romanticism, Sturm und Drang, Enlightenment, Rationalism, Empiricism - to name just a few. Boundaries between these movements and their interpretation were not without ambiguities and uncertainties. Also, it was hard to discern Vuk?s unambiguous stance towards them. Enlightenment was sometimes implied or questioned as part of his legacy, as much as the stereotypical image of Vuk as romantic gained importance. However, Vuk?s Letters provide traces for reconstruction of his worldview and its relationship with the Epoch of Enlightenment - as Kant described his epoch in the famous text from 1784. A comparative reading of this programmatic text (Answering to the Question: What is Enlightenment?) and selection from Vuk?s Letters points to some unexpected similarities between Kant?s and Vuk?s respective positions regarding matters of subjective autonomy and the use of common sense in the public sphere as a necessary medium in which the development of enlightenment is only possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoria Beograd
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2501063a
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vuk and Kant: What is enlightenment?

Lazar Atanasković
Theoria Beograd
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Vuk and Kant: What is enlightenment?

Lazar Atanasković
article en

Abstract

V. S. Karadzic?s legacy was often interpreted in the light of its relationship with different intellectual movements at the end of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century: Romanticism, Sturm und Drang, Enlightenment, Rationalism, Empiricism - to name just a few. Boundaries between these movements and their interpretation were not without ambiguities and uncertainties. Also, it was hard to discern Vuk?s unambiguous stance towards them. Enlightenment was sometimes implied or questioned as part of his legacy, as much as the stereotypical image of Vuk as romantic gained importance. However, Vuk?s Letters provide traces for reconstruction of his worldview and its relationship with the Epoch of Enlightenment - as Kant described his epoch in the famous text from 1784. A comparative reading of this programmatic text (Answering to the Question: What is Enlightenment?) and selection from Vuk?s Letters points to some unexpected similarities between Kant?s and Vuk?s respective positions regarding matters of subjective autonomy and the use of common sense in the public sphere as a necessary medium in which the development of enlightenment is only possible.

Theoria BeogradVol. 68(1)
University of Novi Sad (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Vuk and Kant: What is enlightenment? — Lazar Atanasković · Theoria Beograd (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS