Improving Monitored PM2.5 Data from Low-Cost Sensors in Chiang Mai, Thailand: Utilizing a Nonlinear Regression Modeling Approach

Air pollution, particularly particulate matter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5), is a significant global concern for human health. Technological advances in light-scattering low-cost sensors (LCSs) have facilitated extensive deployment of these devices, enhancing the spatial and temporal resolution of air quality monitoring networks beyond traditional stations. However, LCS measurements often face systematic biases and uncertainties due to technological limitations. This study aimed to calibrate LCS PM2.5 data collected from February 14 to July 31, 2022, in Chiang Mai, Thailand, against reference measurements from the Pollution Control Department (PCD). Two nonlinear regressions, generalized additive model (GAM) and random forest (RF), were employed with linear regression (LR) as the baseline model. Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold and holdout cross-validation and metrics including R², RMSE, MAE, and MAPE. GAM exhibited superior performance compared to LR and RF when incorporating environmental and temporal factors such as temperature, humidity, month, and time (R² = 0.915, RMSE = 5.084 µg/m³). The LR model showed comparable performance (R² = 0.900, RMSE = 5.494 µg/m³), while RF performed well with environmental factors alone (R² = 0. 892, RMSE = 5.742 µg/m³). The GAM calibration significantly reduced MAPE to 17%, followed by LR (19%) and RF (21%). This study demonstrates that the integration of both environmental and temporal variables within the GAM framework is crucial for accurately calibrating LCS PM2.5 data in northern Thailand, considering the region's distinct atmospheric characteristics. Our study underscores the necessity of including environmental and temporal factors in GAM to calibrate LCS-collected PM2.5 data in northern Thailand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Applied Science and Technology
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55003/cast.2025.263964
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Monitored PM2.5 Data from Low-Cost Sensors in Chiang Mai, Thailand: Utilizing a Nonlinear Regression Modeling Approach

Natthanidnan Sricharoen, Pimwarat Srikummoon, Titaporn Supasri, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree et al.
2 citations
Current Applied Science and Technology
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.60
article

Improving Monitored PM2.5 Data from Low-Cost Sensors in Chiang Mai, Thailand: Utilizing a Nonlinear Regression Modeling Approach

Natthanidnan Sricharoen, Pimwarat Srikummoon, Titaporn Supasri, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, Patrinee Traisathit, Jeerasak Longmali
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Air pollution, particularly particulate matter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5), is a significant global concern for human health. Technological advances in light-scattering low-cost sensors (LCSs) have facilitated extensive deployment of these devices, enhancing the spatial and temporal resolution of air quality monitoring networks beyond traditional stations. However, LCS measurements often face systematic biases and uncertainties due to technological limitations. This study aimed to calibrate LCS PM2.5 data collected from February 14 to July 31, 2022, in Chiang Mai, Thailand, against reference measurements from the Pollution Control Department (PCD). Two nonlinear regressions, generalized additive model (GAM) and random forest (RF), were employed with linear regression (LR) as the baseline model. Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold and holdout cross-validation and metrics including R², RMSE, MAE, and MAPE. GAM exhibited superior performance compared to LR and RF when incorporating environmental and temporal factors such as temperature, humidity, month, and time (R² = 0.915, RMSE = 5.084 µg/m³). The LR model showed comparable performance (R² = 0.900, RMSE = 5.494 µg/m³), while RF performed well with environmental factors alone (R² = 0. 892, RMSE = 5.742 µg/m³). The GAM calibration significantly reduced MAPE to 17%, followed by LR (19%) and RF (21%). This study demonstrates that the integration of both environmental and temporal variables within the GAM framework is crucial for accurately calibrating LCS PM2.5 data in northern Thailand, considering the region's distinct atmospheric characteristics. Our study underscores the necessity of including environmental and temporal factors in GAM to calibrate LCS-collected PM2.5 data in northern Thailand.

Current Applied Science and Technology
Chiang Mai University (TH), National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.