Detailing Redundant Pattern–Induced Failures in Transmission Line Towers

Transmission line (TL) towers may fail prematurely during mandatory testing for many reasons, even though they were designed based on the provisions of different standards. Five premature failures observed during full-scale testing at the Tower Testing and Research Station, Structural Engineering Research Centre [Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-SERC], Chennai, India, are grouped into two categories and studied in detail. The first two towers failed due to improper and inadequate redundant patterns and design. The third tower failed due to the detailing not matching the design assumptions. The fourth tower failed due to insufficient bolts in the stitch plates, and the fifth tower due to improper detailing. All the failures are modeled using general-purpose finite-element software. The test and analytical results are compared with the design code provisions. This study emphasizes the importance of detailing and the secondary member design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdccc.sceng-1721
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detailing Redundant Pattern–Induced Failures in Transmission Line Towers

R. P. Rokade, G. S. Palani, R. Balagopal, N. Prasad Rao
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Detailing Redundant Pattern–Induced Failures in Transmission Line Towers

R. P. Rokade, G. S. Palani, R. Balagopal, N. Prasad Rao
article en

Abstract

Transmission line (TL) towers may fail prematurely during mandatory testing for many reasons, even though they were designed based on the provisions of different standards. Five premature failures observed during full-scale testing at the Tower Testing and Research Station, Structural Engineering Research Centre [Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-SERC], Chennai, India, are grouped into two categories and studied in detail. The first two towers failed due to improper and inadequate redundant patterns and design. The third tower failed due to the detailing not matching the design assumptions. The fourth tower failed due to insufficient bolts in the stitch plates, and the fifth tower due to improper detailing. All the failures are modeled using general-purpose finite-element software. The test and analytical results are compared with the design code provisions. This study emphasizes the importance of detailing and the secondary member design.

Journal of structural design and construction practice.Vol. 30(3)
Structural Engineering Research Centre (IN), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.