HEAVENLY SIGNS ON SOCIAL MEDIA. A CONFLICT OF INTERPRETATIONS

During the special military operation (SMO) period, social media abide with photographs of atmospheric phenomena and accompanying short texts which interpret the image as a divination. This practice of semiotizing natural phenomena is rooted in folklore. However, contemporary texts by social media users about heavenly signs are substantively and formally close to institutional rather than folklore narratives. These texts become the subject of a conflict of semiotic ideologies between supporters of the idea of celestial phenomena as an indexical sign of the will of a transcendental actor, followers of conspiracy theories about their technical origin, and users who deny the possibility of semiotization of natural phenomena as a manifestation of the actions of any type of actor. The intensity of the conflict of ideologies is determined by the affordances of social media. In turn, the conflict leads to the formation of self-censorship and the emergence of “zero interpretations” that protect users from possible social risks

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Folklore structure typology semiotics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-5294-2025-8-1-45-68
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HEAVENLY SIGNS ON SOCIAL MEDIA. A CONFLICT OF INTERPRETATIONS

Daria Radchenko
Folklore structure typology semiotics
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
article

HEAVENLY SIGNS ON SOCIAL MEDIA. A CONFLICT OF INTERPRETATIONS

Daria Radchenko
article en

Abstract

During the special military operation (SMO) period, social media abide with photographs of atmospheric phenomena and accompanying short texts which interpret the image as a divination. This practice of semiotizing natural phenomena is rooted in folklore. However, contemporary texts by social media users about heavenly signs are substantively and formally close to institutional rather than folklore narratives. These texts become the subject of a conflict of semiotic ideologies between supporters of the idea of celestial phenomena as an indexical sign of the will of a transcendental actor, followers of conspiracy theories about their technical origin, and users who deny the possibility of semiotization of natural phenomena as a manifestation of the actions of any type of actor. The intensity of the conflict of ideologies is determined by the affordances of social media. In turn, the conflict leads to the formation of self-censorship and the emergence of “zero interpretations” that protect users from possible social risks

Folklore structure typology semioticsVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

HEAVENLY SIGNS ON SOCIAL MEDIA. A CONFLICT OF INTERPRETATIONS — Daria Radchenko · Folklore structure typology semiotics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS