When Do Teams Communicate More Asynchronously to Support Their Members’ Multiteaming?

Knowledge-based teams that work on challenging tasks typically have members who are involved in multiple concurrent teams. These teams commonly use technologies to communicate, yet research largely studied multiple team membership (MTM) and team virtual exchanges independently whereas, in reality, they are coupled. Some scholars, however, have advised such teams to leverage technologies for asynchronous work to facilitate their members’ multiteaming. Using adaptive structuration theory as an overarching lens, we develop a model to address this advice and understand when and with which effect teams organize their work more asynchronously in response to their members’ multiteaming. Findings from 176 student teams show that when MTM teamwork demands are higher, MTM number is positively related to team asynchronous communication, which in turn is negatively associated with team creativity via information elaboration. Our research presents team asynchronicity as both a more common and more costly remedy for multiteaming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Group Research
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964251325209
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Do Teams Communicate More Asynchronously to Support Their Members’ Multiteaming?

Mayssa Rishani, Inga J. Hoever, Dirk van Dierendonck
2 citations
Small Group Research
Team Dynamics and Performance
4.88
article

When Do Teams Communicate More Asynchronously to Support Their Members’ Multiteaming?

Mayssa Rishani, Inga J. Hoever, Dirk van Dierendonck
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Knowledge-based teams that work on challenging tasks typically have members who are involved in multiple concurrent teams. These teams commonly use technologies to communicate, yet research largely studied multiple team membership (MTM) and team virtual exchanges independently whereas, in reality, they are coupled. Some scholars, however, have advised such teams to leverage technologies for asynchronous work to facilitate their members’ multiteaming. Using adaptive structuration theory as an overarching lens, we develop a model to address this advice and understand when and with which effect teams organize their work more asynchronously in response to their members’ multiteaming. Findings from 176 student teams show that when MTM teamwork demands are higher, MTM number is positively related to team asynchronous communication, which in turn is negatively associated with team creativity via information elaboration. Our research presents team asynchronicity as both a more common and more costly remedy for multiteaming.

Small Group ResearchVol. 56(6)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Team Dynamics and Performance
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.