Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Model for Representing Hierarchical and Conflicting Databases to Approximate Human-Seat Interaction

It has been shown that working with databases from heterogeneous sources of varying fidelity can be leveraged in multi-fidelity surrogate models to enhance the high-fidelity prediction accuracy or, equivalently, to reduce the amount of high-fidelity data and thus computational effort required while maintaining accuracy. In contrast, this contribution leverages low-fidelity data queried on a larger feature space to realize data-driven multi-fidelity surrogate models with a fallback option in regimes where high-fidelity data is unavailable. Accordingly, methodologies are introduced to fulfill this task and effectively resolve the contradictions, that inherently arise in multi-fidelity databases. In particular, the databases considered in this contribution feature two levels of fidelity with a defined hierarchy, where data from a high-fidelity source is, when available, prioritized over low-fidelity data. The proposed surrogate model architectures are illustrated first with a toy problem and further examined in the context of an engineering use case in autonomous driving, where the human-seat interaction is evaluated using a data-driven surrogate model, that is trained through an active learning approach. It is shown, that two proposed architectures achieve an improvement in accuracy on high-fidelity data while simultaneously performing well where high-fidelity data is unavailable compared to a naive approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.03.058
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Model for Representing Hierarchical and Conflicting Databases to Approximate Human-Seat Interaction

Joachim Linn, Niklas Fahse, Jörg Fehr, Jonas Kneifl et al.
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Model for Representing Hierarchical and Conflicting Databases to Approximate Human-Seat Interaction

Joachim Linn, Niklas Fahse, Jörg Fehr, Jonas Kneifl, Gia Huy Mike Huynh
article en

Abstract

It has been shown that working with databases from heterogeneous sources of varying fidelity can be leveraged in multi-fidelity surrogate models to enhance the high-fidelity prediction accuracy or, equivalently, to reduce the amount of high-fidelity data and thus computational effort required while maintaining accuracy. In contrast, this contribution leverages low-fidelity data queried on a larger feature space to realize data-driven multi-fidelity surrogate models with a fallback option in regimes where high-fidelity data is unavailable. Accordingly, methodologies are introduced to fulfill this task and effectively resolve the contradictions, that inherently arise in multi-fidelity databases. In particular, the databases considered in this contribution feature two levels of fidelity with a defined hierarchy, where data from a high-fidelity source is, when available, prioritized over low-fidelity data. The proposed surrogate model architectures are illustrated first with a toy problem and further examined in the context of an engineering use case in autonomous driving, where the human-seat interaction is evaluated using a data-driven surrogate model, that is trained through an active learning approach. It is shown, that two proposed architectures achieve an improvement in accuracy on high-fidelity data while simultaneously performing well where high-fidelity data is unavailable compared to a naive approach.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(1)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.