Daytime aversive stimuli do not phase shift behavioral rhythms under light-dark cycles in a strictly diurnal rodent

Recent studies have shown that cyclic aversive stimuli (time-specific footshocks) act as a nonphotic zeitgeber, shifting circadian behaviors to the daytime in nocturnal rodents through entrainment. It has remained untested whether diurnal species exhibit similar plasticity in behavioral timing. This study investigated whether antelope ground squirrels (<i>Ammospermophilus leucurus</i>, AGS), naturally diurnal rodents, shift activity timing in response to cyclic aversive stimuli delivered at specific phases of the light-dark (LD) cycle. We conducted two experiments with 20 AGS housed in custom cages featuring a safe nesting area and a separate foraging area rendered potentially aversive by unsignaled time-specific footshocks. In Experiment 1, animals were subjected to a 12:12 LD cycle. One group was exposed to a foraging area that produced footshocks during the light phase, and a control group with footshocks during the dark phase. In Experiment 2, under a 16:8 LD cycle, animals were divided into three groups, with footshock exposure either during the first or second half of the light phase or during the dark phase. Following treatments, animals were released into constant darkness (DD) to assess free-running rhythms. Contrary to findings in nocturnal rodents, AGS did not exhibit consistent complementary shifts to nocturnal activity as an avoidance of footshocks received during daytime. Most animals maintained diurnal activity, showing minor, and inconsistent phase adjustments. In Experiment 2, animals exposed to footshocks during part of the light phase also failed to reliably shift activity to the "safe" portion of the light phase. These findings show AGS do not substantially shift activity patterns in response to cyclic aversive stimuli and that a 24-h cyclic fear stimulus fails to override the LD cycle as a zeitgeber. This suggests a lack of plasticity in circadian behavior and highlights the importance of species-specific differences in response to potential nonphotic zeitgebers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biological Rhythms
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07487304251321214
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Daytime aversive stimuli do not phase shift behavioral rhythms under light-dark cycles in a strictly diurnal rodent

G. J. Kenagy, Victor Y. Zhang, Horacio O. de la Iglesia
Journal of Biological Rhythms
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
article

Daytime aversive stimuli do not phase shift behavioral rhythms under light-dark cycles in a strictly diurnal rodent

G. J. Kenagy, Victor Y. Zhang, Horacio O. de la Iglesia
article en

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that cyclic aversive stimuli (time-specific footshocks) act as a nonphotic zeitgeber, shifting circadian behaviors to the daytime in nocturnal rodents through entrainment. It has remained untested whether diurnal species exhibit similar plasticity in behavioral timing. This study investigated whether antelope ground squirrels (<i>Ammospermophilus leucurus</i>, AGS), naturally diurnal rodents, shift activity timing in response to cyclic aversive stimuli delivered at specific phases of the light-dark (LD) cycle. We conducted two experiments with 20 AGS housed in custom cages featuring a safe nesting area and a separate foraging area rendered potentially aversive by unsignaled time-specific footshocks. In Experiment 1, animals were subjected to a 12:12 LD cycle. One group was exposed to a foraging area that produced footshocks during the light phase, and a control group with footshocks during the dark phase. In Experiment 2, under a 16:8 LD cycle, animals were divided into three groups, with footshock exposure either during the first or second half of the light phase or during the dark phase. Following treatments, animals were released into constant darkness (DD) to assess free-running rhythms. Contrary to findings in nocturnal rodents, AGS did not exhibit consistent complementary shifts to nocturnal activity as an avoidance of footshocks received during daytime. Most animals maintained diurnal activity, showing minor, and inconsistent phase adjustments. In Experiment 2, animals exposed to footshocks during part of the light phase also failed to reliably shift activity to the "safe" portion of the light phase. These findings show AGS do not substantially shift activity patterns in response to cyclic aversive stimuli and that a 24-h cyclic fear stimulus fails to override the LD cycle as a zeitgeber. This suggests a lack of plasticity in circadian behavior and highlights the importance of species-specific differences in response to potential nonphotic zeitgebers.

Journal of Biological RhythmsVol. 40(3)
University of Washington (US)
National Institutes of Health
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.