Equality or generosity: The role of between-group competition in children’s resource allocation with in-group collaborators

This research examined the effect of between-group competitive relationships and group status (win/loss outcomes) on children’s tendency to make generous or equal allocations to in-group collaborators. Children aged 3–8 years ( N = 298 in Study 1; N = 264 in Study 2) were asked to complete between-group competitive games and were further asked to allocate between themselves and their in-group collaborators. The results showed that, with age, children made more equal allocations to in-group collaborators in the win condition, whereas they made more generous allocations to in-group collaborators in the loss condition. The results revealed that, with age, children prioritized fair allocations with collaborators when winning while emphasizing friendly relationships when losing, indicating the complexity of children’s allocations with in-group collaborators following between-group competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251320356
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equality or generosity: The role of between-group competition in children’s resource allocation with in-group collaborators

Yanfang Li, Xue Xiao
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Equality or generosity: The role of between-group competition in children’s resource allocation with in-group collaborators

Yanfang Li, Xue Xiao
article en

Abstract

This research examined the effect of between-group competitive relationships and group status (win/loss outcomes) on children’s tendency to make generous or equal allocations to in-group collaborators. Children aged 3–8 years ( N = 298 in Study 1; N = 264 in Study 2) were asked to complete between-group competitive games and were further asked to allocate between themselves and their in-group collaborators. The results showed that, with age, children made more equal allocations to in-group collaborators in the win condition, whereas they made more generous allocations to in-group collaborators in the loss condition. The results revealed that, with age, children prioritized fair allocations with collaborators when winning while emphasizing friendly relationships when losing, indicating the complexity of children’s allocations with in-group collaborators following between-group competition.

Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsVol. 28(6)
Beijing Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.