The relative effects of design thinking versus after-action review on team performance: An experiential/episodic team learning perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001277
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relative effects of design thinking versus after-action review on team performance: An experiential/episodic team learning perspective.

Peter Bamberger, Dana R. Vashdi, Jingqiu Chen, Gilad Chen et al.
1 citations
Journal of Applied Psychology
Design Education and Practice
0.71
article

The relative effects of design thinking versus after-action review on team performance: An experiential/episodic team learning perspective.

Peter Bamberger, Dana R. Vashdi, Jingqiu Chen, Gilad Chen, Qingyue Fan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Journal of Applied PsychologyVol. 110(10)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Haifa (IL)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Design Education and Practice
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.