Comparing youth-friendly clinics to the standard of care for adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: A qualitative analysis

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face difficulties accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. Youth-friendly service delivery models may prove an alternative to increase SRH service uptake. This analysis utilises evidence from the Girl Power-Malawi study, a study designed to compare the impact of different models of service delivery on SRH service uptake for AGYW. Three intervention clinics trained providers in youth-friendly health services (YFHS), engaged young peer educators in patient outreach, expanded hours and integrated various services into youth-dedicated spaces. A standard of care (SOC) clinic was included as a comparator. This paper draws on qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 60 participants (15 per clinic) and 8 focus group discussions (2 per clinic). Thematic analysis identified three key themes regarding SRH service acceptability: having peer educators made AGYW feel more comfortable seeking services; AGYW perceived services at intervention clinics to be more private; and clinic modifications such as free services, longer operating hours and integration of different SRH services made services easier to access. Adolescents expressed that these factors contributed to higher service uptake in intervention clinics. Youth-friendly service provisions are needed to ensure AGYW find care-seeking acceptable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Public Health
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2481466
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing youth-friendly clinics to the standard of care for adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: A qualitative analysis

Nora E. Rosenberg, Lauren A. Graybill, Mina C. Hosseinipour, Linda Kamtsendero et al.
1 citations
Global Public Health
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
2.82
article

Comparing youth-friendly clinics to the standard of care for adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: A qualitative analysis

Nora E. Rosenberg, Lauren A. Graybill, Mina C. Hosseinipour, Linda Kamtsendero, Nivedita L. Bhushan, Linda‐Gail Bekker, Bertha Maseko, Caroline McKay, Audrey E. Pettifor, Dhrutika Vansia, Twambilile Phanga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face difficulties accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. Youth-friendly service delivery models may prove an alternative to increase SRH service uptake. This analysis utilises evidence from the Girl Power-Malawi study, a study designed to compare the impact of different models of service delivery on SRH service uptake for AGYW. Three intervention clinics trained providers in youth-friendly health services (YFHS), engaged young peer educators in patient outreach, expanded hours and integrated various services into youth-dedicated spaces. A standard of care (SOC) clinic was included as a comparator. This paper draws on qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 60 participants (15 per clinic) and 8 focus group discussions (2 per clinic). Thematic analysis identified three key themes regarding SRH service acceptability: having peer educators made AGYW feel more comfortable seeking services; AGYW perceived services at intervention clinics to be more private; and clinic modifications such as free services, longer operating hours and integration of different SRH services made services easier to access. Adolescents expressed that these factors contributed to higher service uptake in intervention clinics. Youth-friendly service provisions are needed to ensure AGYW find care-seeking acceptable.

Global Public HealthVol. 20(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation (ZA), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Malawi (MW), University of Cape Town (ZA), RTI International (US), Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme (MW), Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation (UG)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fogarty International Center, Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.