Fatigue failure of rivets and bolts in shear

Double-covered shear joints with hot rivets or with snug tight bolts subjected to cyclic load may fail in the ply or in the fastener. Tests with the latter failure mode are sparse and scattered. This paper combines these data and attempts to provide a unified theory on the fatigue driving force for this failure mode. Using the finite element method, we demonstrate that the nominal shear stress in the fastener is not a good indicator of its fatigue performance, because it ignores frictional force transfer and assumes an equal load share between fasteners. We provide an analytical model for the actual shear stress range. We derive S–N curves for this shear stress range, either using straightforward regression of test data or using Bayesian inference of the decisive failure type (ply or fastener). Finally, we derive the geometries and loads for which fastener failure is decisive over ply failure. • We study fatigue of non-prestressed fasteners in double-covered shear joints. • Shear failure of fasteners is less common than net section failure of plies. • Shear failure occurs for small fastener radius, small fastener number & low mean load. • We derive equations to estimate the shear stress range in the fasteners. • We give the associated S–N curves using tests on bolted and riveted joints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fatigue
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.108929
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fatigue failure of rivets and bolts in shear

Jorrit Rodenburg, Sjoerd T. Hengeveld, Johan Maljaars
2 citations
International Journal of Fatigue
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
1.73
article

Fatigue failure of rivets and bolts in shear

Jorrit Rodenburg, Sjoerd T. Hengeveld, Johan Maljaars
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Double-covered shear joints with hot rivets or with snug tight bolts subjected to cyclic load may fail in the ply or in the fastener. Tests with the latter failure mode are sparse and scattered. This paper combines these data and attempts to provide a unified theory on the fatigue driving force for this failure mode. Using the finite element method, we demonstrate that the nominal shear stress in the fastener is not a good indicator of its fatigue performance, because it ignores frictional force transfer and assumes an equal load share between fasteners. We provide an analytical model for the actual shear stress range. We derive S–N curves for this shear stress range, either using straightforward regression of test data or using Bayesian inference of the decisive failure type (ply or fastener). Finally, we derive the geometries and loads for which fastener failure is decisive over ply failure. • We study fatigue of non-prestressed fasteners in double-covered shear joints. • Shear failure of fasteners is less common than net section failure of plies. • Shear failure occurs for small fastener radius, small fastener number & low mean load. • We derive equations to estimate the shear stress range in the fasteners. • We give the associated S–N curves using tests on bolted and riveted joints.

International Journal of FatigueVol. 197
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Rijkswaterstaat
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.