Analysis of complications of dental treatment using orthopedic structures with different types of fixation on dental implants

Dental treatment using dental implants with partial and complete absence of teeth is becoming a priority among all methods of orthopedic dental treatment. One of the urgent issues is the justification of the choice of fixation of prostheses on implants. To date, screw, cement and combined fixation of prosthetic structures based on dental implants are distinguished. Understanding the biomechanical properties, manufacturing features, and fixation of the prosthesis will help the clinician choose the ideal design for each clinical case, as well as improve the final aesthetic and functional results. Currently, the most important task of practical dentistry is the prevention of complications associated with the peculiarities of prosthetics on dental implants. The purpose of the study: to analyze the complications of dental treatment using non-removable orthopedic structures supported by dental implants using various methods of fixation. Materials and methods. The article presents the results of a three–year clinical study of 136 dental implants with different types of fixation of orthopedic structures: 46 with cement fixation, 52 with screw fixation and 38 with combined fixation. A dental examination of 50 patients was performed with the recording of clinical and radiological parameters. Statistical differences between the groups were determined using Pearson’s chi-square test (at p<0.05). Conclusion. The results of this study make it possible to identify structures with a combined type of fixation as a priority in prosthetics on dental implants due to their excellent aesthetics, occlusion, and ease of manufacture, reduction of the patient’s stay in the dental chair and a low level of all types of complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20251801123
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of complications of dental treatment using orthopedic structures with different types of fixation on dental implants

Д.А. Моисеев, R.S. Pulatova, U. G. Vokhidov, Abdullah A. Al Salloum et al.
4 citations
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
7.16
article

Analysis of complications of dental treatment using orthopedic structures with different types of fixation on dental implants

Д.А. Моисеев, R.S. Pulatova, U. G. Vokhidov, Abdullah A. Al Salloum, S.Zh. Zhusupbekov, Valery Strelnikov, M. Ebrakhim
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Dental treatment using dental implants with partial and complete absence of teeth is becoming a priority among all methods of orthopedic dental treatment. One of the urgent issues is the justification of the choice of fixation of prostheses on implants. To date, screw, cement and combined fixation of prosthetic structures based on dental implants are distinguished. Understanding the biomechanical properties, manufacturing features, and fixation of the prosthesis will help the clinician choose the ideal design for each clinical case, as well as improve the final aesthetic and functional results. Currently, the most important task of practical dentistry is the prevention of complications associated with the peculiarities of prosthetics on dental implants. The purpose of the study: to analyze the complications of dental treatment using non-removable orthopedic structures supported by dental implants using various methods of fixation. Materials and methods. The article presents the results of a three–year clinical study of 136 dental implants with different types of fixation of orthopedic structures: 46 with cement fixation, 52 with screw fixation and 38 with combined fixation. A dental examination of 50 patients was performed with the recording of clinical and radiological parameters. Statistical differences between the groups were determined using Pearson’s chi-square test (at p<0.05). Conclusion. The results of this study make it possible to identify structures with a combined type of fixation as a priority in prosthetics on dental implants due to their excellent aesthetics, occlusion, and ease of manufacture, reduction of the patient’s stay in the dental chair and a low level of all types of complications.

Russian Journal of StomatologyVol. 18(1)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU), Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino (UZ), Tver State Medical University (RU), National Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.