Simple and High-Precision Hamiltonian Simulation by Compensating Trotter Error with Linear Combination of Unitary Operations

Trotter and linear combination of unitary (LCU) operations are two popular Hamiltonian simulation methods. The Trotter method is easy to implement and enjoys good system-size dependence endowed by commutator scaling, while the LCU method admits high-accuracy simulation with a smaller gate cost. We propose Hamiltonian simulation algorithms using LCU to compensate Trotter error, which enjoy both of their advantages. By adding few gates after the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><a:mi>K</a:mi><a:mi>th</a:mi></a:math>-order Trotter formula, we realize a better time scaling than <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><d:mn>2</d:mn><d:mi>K</d:mi><d:mi>th</d:mi></d:math>-order Trotter. Our first algorithm exponentially improves the accuracy scaling of the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><g:mi>K</g:mi><g:mi>th</g:mi></g:math>-order Trotter formula. For a generic Hamiltonian, the estimated gate counts of the first algorithm can be 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the best analytical bound of fourth-order Trotter formula. In the second algorithm, we consider the detailed structure of Hamiltonians and construct LCU for Trotter errors with commutator scaling. Consequently, for lattice Hamiltonians, the algorithm enjoys almost linear system-size dependence and quadratically improves the accuracy of the <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><j:mi>K</j:mi><j:mi>th</j:mi></j:math>-order Trotter. For the lattice system, the second algorithm can achieve 3 to 4 orders of magnitude higher accuracy with the same gate costs as the optimal Trotter algorithm. These algorithms provide an easy-to-implement approach to achieve a low-cost and high-precision Hamiltonian simulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRX Quantum
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.6.010359
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simple and High-Precision Hamiltonian Simulation by Compensating Trotter Error with Linear Combination of Unitary Operations

Pei Zeng, Qi Zhao, Liang Jiang, Jinzhao Sun
8 citations
PRX Quantum
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
19.85
article

Simple and High-Precision Hamiltonian Simulation by Compensating Trotter Error with Linear Combination of Unitary Operations

Pei Zeng, Qi Zhao, Liang Jiang, Jinzhao Sun
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Trotter and linear combination of unitary (LCU) operations are two popular Hamiltonian simulation methods. The Trotter method is easy to implement and enjoys good system-size dependence endowed by commutator scaling, while the LCU method admits high-accuracy simulation with a smaller gate cost. We propose Hamiltonian simulation algorithms using LCU to compensate Trotter error, which enjoy both of their advantages. By adding few gates after the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><a:mi>K</a:mi><a:mi>th</a:mi></a:math>-order Trotter formula, we realize a better time scaling than <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><d:mn>2</d:mn><d:mi>K</d:mi><d:mi>th</d:mi></d:math>-order Trotter. Our first algorithm exponentially improves the accuracy scaling of the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><g:mi>K</g:mi><g:mi>th</g:mi></g:math>-order Trotter formula. For a generic Hamiltonian, the estimated gate counts of the first algorithm can be 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the best analytical bound of fourth-order Trotter formula. In the second algorithm, we consider the detailed structure of Hamiltonians and construct LCU for Trotter errors with commutator scaling. Consequently, for lattice Hamiltonians, the algorithm enjoys almost linear system-size dependence and quadratically improves the accuracy of the <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><j:mi>K</j:mi><j:mi>th</j:mi></j:math>-order Trotter. For the lattice system, the second algorithm can achieve 3 to 4 orders of magnitude higher accuracy with the same gate costs as the optimal Trotter algorithm. These algorithms provide an easy-to-implement approach to achieve a low-cost and high-precision Hamiltonian simulation.

PRX QuantumVol. 6(1)
University of Oxford (GB), University of Chicago (US), Imperial College London (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
19.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.