Estimating Seismic Performance Factors for a Dual System Comprising Buckling Restrained Brace Frames and Intermediate Moment Frames

Dual structural system is referred when two different lateral systems are combined together to provide the lateral force resisting system for a building structure. For different structural and architectural reasons, dual systems are used in building structures. The most common types of dual systems include special moment resisting frames (SMRF) combined with eccentric braced frames (EBF) or buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) in steel buildings and special reinforced concrete moment frames combined with special reinforced concrete shear walls in reinforced concrete buildings. Buckling restrained braced frame is a lateral framing system that are being used in high seismic zones. According to American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), a dual system is permitted between buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) and special moment resisting frames (SMRF) where SMRFs must be capable of resisting at least 25% of prescribed seismic force. Conventionally, dual systems are utilized at high seismic zones. For moderate seismic zones intermediate moment resisting frames (IMF) can be used instead of SMRF. But, ASCE does not provide any guideline to assess the structural responses when a dual system combining BRBF and IMRF are used in buildings located at moderate seismic zones. This research, shows a methodology to calculate the seismic parameters like Response Modification Coefficient (R), Over - strength Factor (Ωo) and Deflection Amplification Factor (Cd) which are not described by ASCE or FEMA guideline. Several archetypes of building structures are designed following FEMA guidelines with modified R as trial values for different seismic zones. To validate the trial values for R, system over - strength and period - based ductility, nonlinear 3D static (pushover) analyses were performed .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Inżynieria Mineralna
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29227/im-2024-02-30
Primary Topic
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Seismic Performance Factors for a Dual System Comprising Buckling Restrained Brace Frames and Intermediate Moment Frames

Sipan Yavarian, Rais Ahmad
4 links
Inżynieria Mineralna
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
article

Estimating Seismic Performance Factors for a Dual System Comprising Buckling Restrained Brace Frames and Intermediate Moment Frames

Sipan Yavarian, Rais Ahmad
article en

Abstract

Dual structural system is referred when two different lateral systems are combined together to provide the lateral force resisting system for a building structure. For different structural and architectural reasons, dual systems are used in building structures. The most common types of dual systems include special moment resisting frames (SMRF) combined with eccentric braced frames (EBF) or buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) in steel buildings and special reinforced concrete moment frames combined with special reinforced concrete shear walls in reinforced concrete buildings. Buckling restrained braced frame is a lateral framing system that are being used in high seismic zones. According to American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), a dual system is permitted between buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) and special moment resisting frames (SMRF) where SMRFs must be capable of resisting at least 25% of prescribed seismic force. Conventionally, dual systems are utilized at high seismic zones. For moderate seismic zones intermediate moment resisting frames (IMF) can be used instead of SMRF. But, ASCE does not provide any guideline to assess the structural responses when a dual system combining BRBF and IMRF are used in buildings located at moderate seismic zones. This research, shows a methodology to calculate the seismic parameters like Response Modification Coefficient (R), Over - strength Factor (Ωo) and Deflection Amplification Factor (Cd) which are not described by ASCE or FEMA guideline. Several archetypes of building structures are designed following FEMA guidelines with modified R as trial values for different seismic zones. To validate the trial values for R, system over - strength and period - based ductility, nonlinear 3D static (pushover) analyses were performed .

Inżynieria MineralnaVol. 1(2)
California State University, Northridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.