Conducting qualitative research on acute mental health inpatient wards: Lessons from the field

Qualitative process evaluations incorporating ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews are increasingly being used to supplement randomised control trials when designing and testing complex health interventions, including in mental health inpatient settings. Yet how these components are conducted is less discussed. In this paper we describe our approach to conducting ethnographic participant observations on acute mental health inpatient wards. We discuss how we mitigated, negotiated, and adapted our research to effectively and sensitively complete these elements. We demonstrate the significance of personal and team reflective practice in guiding the research and provide reflections from the researchers on our direct experience of completing observations. Throughout the paper we discuss how we familiarised ourselves to individual research sites, reflected on our roles on the ward, adapted qualitative research techniques for acute mental health settings and the significance of peer debriefing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319609
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conducting qualitative research on acute mental health inpatient wards: Lessons from the field

Isobel Johnston, Jessica Raphael, Dawn Edge, Katherine Berry et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Health Policy Implementation Science
5.63
article

Conducting qualitative research on acute mental health inpatient wards: Lessons from the field

Isobel Johnston, Jessica Raphael, Dawn Edge, Katherine Berry, Paul Wilson, Helen Morley, Gill Gilworth
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Qualitative process evaluations incorporating ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews are increasingly being used to supplement randomised control trials when designing and testing complex health interventions, including in mental health inpatient settings. Yet how these components are conducted is less discussed. In this paper we describe our approach to conducting ethnographic participant observations on acute mental health inpatient wards. We discuss how we mitigated, negotiated, and adapted our research to effectively and sensitively complete these elements. We demonstrate the significance of personal and team reflective practice in guiding the research and provide reflections from the researchers on our direct experience of completing observations. Throughout the paper we discuss how we familiarised ourselves to individual research sites, reflected on our roles on the ward, adapted qualitative research techniques for acute mental health settings and the significance of peer debriefing.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(3)
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conducting qualitative research on acute mental health inpatient wards: Lessons from the field — Isobel Johnston, Jessica Raphael, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS