Comparison of manual versus mechanical chest compression with ETCO2 value in-hospital cardiac arrest:  A prospective observational study

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of manual versus mechanical chest compression by using continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) monitoring in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Methods: The study included 90 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Forty-seven (52.2%) patients were male and 43 (47.8%) were female. A prospective observational study of patients who experienced cardiac arrest while being monitored at the emergency department (ED) was conducted at the ED of a tertiary university hospital between April 2018 and September 2019. Demographics, electrocardiography (ECG) rhythm, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) technique (manual or automatic), laboratory data, the time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), length of stay in the ED, hospitalization, and mortality were compared according to CPR type. Forty-four (48%) patients underwent manual CPR, and 46 (52%) patients underwent automatic CPR. Results: The 15th-minute and 20th-minute oxygen saturation (SaO2) levels, and the 10th-, 15th-, and 20th-minute ETCO2 levels showed a significant difference between the automatic CPR and manual CPR with all three variables being higher in the automatic CPR group (p=0.013, p=0.002, p=0.037, p=0.002, p<0.001, respectively). The causes of cardiopulmonary arrest, consultations, POCUS results, post-CPR lifetime, treatment types and neurological conditions were similar in both of the groups. Exitus was more frequent in the manual CPR device group (p=0,013). Conclusion: Mechanical Chest Compression provides more high-quality CPR than manual Chest Compression in-hospital cardiac arrest, and mid-resuscitation ETCO2 values equal to or greater than 20 mmHg appear to be a good predictor of ROSC. How to cite this article Yılmaz Y, Yılmaz F, Yılmaz A, Sönmez BM, Tekkanat S, Kavalcı C, Komut S, Beydilli İ, Zortuk Ö. Comparison of manual versus mechanical chest compression with ETCO2 value in-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective observational study. J Med Dent Invest. 2025;6:e250172.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical and Dental Investigations
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e250172
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of manual versus mechanical chest compression with ETCO2 value in-hospital cardiac arrest:  A prospective observational study

Fevzi Yılmaz, İnan Beydilli, Seval Komut, Bedriye Müge Sönmez et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical and Dental Investigations
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
article

Comparison of manual versus mechanical chest compression with ETCO2 value in-hospital cardiac arrest:  A prospective observational study

Fevzi Yılmaz, İnan Beydilli, Seval Komut, Bedriye Müge Sönmez, Cemil Kavalcı, Ökkeş Zortuk, Selma Tekkanat, Yavuz Yılmaz, Aykut Yılmaz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of manual versus mechanical chest compression by using continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) monitoring in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Methods: The study included 90 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Forty-seven (52.2%) patients were male and 43 (47.8%) were female. A prospective observational study of patients who experienced cardiac arrest while being monitored at the emergency department (ED) was conducted at the ED of a tertiary university hospital between April 2018 and September 2019. Demographics, electrocardiography (ECG) rhythm, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) technique (manual or automatic), laboratory data, the time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), length of stay in the ED, hospitalization, and mortality were compared according to CPR type. Forty-four (48%) patients underwent manual CPR, and 46 (52%) patients underwent automatic CPR. Results: The 15th-minute and 20th-minute oxygen saturation (SaO2) levels, and the 10th-, 15th-, and 20th-minute ETCO2 levels showed a significant difference between the automatic CPR and manual CPR with all three variables being higher in the automatic CPR group (p=0.013, p=0.002, p=0.037, p=0.002, p<0.001, respectively). The causes of cardiopulmonary arrest, consultations, POCUS results, post-CPR lifetime, treatment types and neurological conditions were similar in both of the groups. Exitus was more frequent in the manual CPR device group (p=0,013). Conclusion: Mechanical Chest Compression provides more high-quality CPR than manual Chest Compression in-hospital cardiac arrest, and mid-resuscitation ETCO2 values equal to or greater than 20 mmHg appear to be a good predictor of ROSC. How to cite this article Yılmaz Y, Yılmaz F, Yılmaz A, Sönmez BM, Tekkanat S, Kavalcı C, Komut S, Beydilli İ, Zortuk Ö. Comparison of manual versus mechanical chest compression with ETCO2 value in-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective observational study. J Med Dent Invest. 2025;6:e250172.

Journal of Medical and Dental InvestigationsVol. 6
Ministry of Health (TR), Siirt Üniversitesi (TR), Hakkari University (TR), University of Health Science (KH), Hitit Üniversitesi (TR), Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi, Mersin Üniversitesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.