Impact analysis assessment of UAS collision with a human body

This study investigates the safety risks of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) collisions with humans, focusing on impact dynamics through controlled crash testing. Utilizing a custom-designed drop mechanism, 49 impact tests were conducted on a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device at various velocities and kinetic energies (7-24 m/s and 1-280 J). Tested UASs included a range of designs and weights (20 g to over 1 kg). Results demonstrated limitations in using kinetic energy models and peak head acceleration for injury prediction. The Head Injury Criterion showed greater consistency, reflecting the temporal profile of impacts. Findings revealed that UAS structural fragility reduces energy transfer at higher impacts through deformation and fracturing. This work underscores the need for improved testing protocols and nuanced safety standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320073
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact analysis assessment of UAS collision with a human body

Pavel Vrtal, Karel Kocián, Michal Frydrýn, Luboš Nouzovský et al.
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
4.56
article

Impact analysis assessment of UAS collision with a human body

Pavel Vrtal, Karel Kocián, Michal Frydrýn, Luboš Nouzovský, Zdeněk Svatý, Tomáš Mičunek, Tomáš Kohout, Tomáš Blodek
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the safety risks of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) collisions with humans, focusing on impact dynamics through controlled crash testing. Utilizing a custom-designed drop mechanism, 49 impact tests were conducted on a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device at various velocities and kinetic energies (7-24 m/s and 1-280 J). Tested UASs included a range of designs and weights (20 g to over 1 kg). Results demonstrated limitations in using kinetic energy models and peak head acceleration for injury prediction. The Head Injury Criterion showed greater consistency, reflecting the temporal profile of impacts. Findings revealed that UAS structural fragility reduces energy transfer at higher impacts through deformation and fracturing. This work underscores the need for improved testing protocols and nuanced safety standards.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(3)
Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Technology Agency of the Czech Republic
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.