Curriculum as policy deception: a critical analysis of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge inclusion in the Australian Curriculum

Abstract Education systems founded on the legacies and structures of colonisation (for example, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada) have established curricular structures that have perpetuated and entrenched processes and practices that marginalise and delegitimise Indigenous people and knowledge. We argue that the approach to curriculum inclusion used within the Australian context is an act of policy deception, hiding in plain sight the hierarchical othering of Indigenous knowledges, such that they are positioned as points of epistemic contrast that legitimate the ‘inviolable assertions’ of Western knowledge embedded in the school curriculum. We argue that the inherent structures that rationalise the goals and organisation at the ‘institutional’ curriculum level of the Australian Curriculum contribute to the impossibility of teachers legitimising Aboriginal Knowledge systems as part of disciplinary thinking in genuine ways. Such knowledges are relegated to a surface-level treatment within existing school subjects, including their representation within formal curriculum materials and their authentic enactment within classrooms. We contend that as a national reconciliation and consensus-building project, the Australian Curriculum's inherent structures have not only failed to support the development of deep engagement and understanding of Indigenous worldviews but also constrain teachers’ agency to extend their disciplinary thinking beyond the bounds of Western knowledge. We invite consideration of the reparative work necessary to imagine new ways of structuring and approaching curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00824-6
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curriculum as policy deception: a critical analysis of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge inclusion in the Australian Curriculum

Katherine Thompson, P. R. Poulton, Claire Golledge, Kevin Lowe
6 citations
The Australian Educational Researcher
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
25.21
article

Curriculum as policy deception: a critical analysis of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge inclusion in the Australian Curriculum

Katherine Thompson, P. R. Poulton, Claire Golledge, Kevin Lowe
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Education systems founded on the legacies and structures of colonisation (for example, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada) have established curricular structures that have perpetuated and entrenched processes and practices that marginalise and delegitimise Indigenous people and knowledge. We argue that the approach to curriculum inclusion used within the Australian context is an act of policy deception, hiding in plain sight the hierarchical othering of Indigenous knowledges, such that they are positioned as points of epistemic contrast that legitimate the ‘inviolable assertions’ of Western knowledge embedded in the school curriculum. We argue that the inherent structures that rationalise the goals and organisation at the ‘institutional’ curriculum level of the Australian Curriculum contribute to the impossibility of teachers legitimising Aboriginal Knowledge systems as part of disciplinary thinking in genuine ways. Such knowledges are relegated to a surface-level treatment within existing school subjects, including their representation within formal curriculum materials and their authentic enactment within classrooms. We contend that as a national reconciliation and consensus-building project, the Australian Curriculum's inherent structures have not only failed to support the development of deep engagement and understanding of Indigenous worldviews but also constrain teachers’ agency to extend their disciplinary thinking beyond the bounds of Western knowledge. We invite consideration of the reparative work necessary to imagine new ways of structuring and approaching curriculum.

The Australian Educational ResearcherVol. 52(3)
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), RMIT University (AU)
University of Sydney, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.