Ocena porównawcza ugięć płyt żelbetowych z pustkami: Analiza MES i obliczenia ręczne

This article presents a comprehensive comparative study of deflection voided reinforced concrete slabs, evaluating the resultsobtained through Finite Element Method (FEM) analyses of various accuracy and manual calculations, specifically employingthe method of strips. Distinct methodologies used for analysis are: FEM analysis using SCIA Engineer, where voids in the slabare accounted for by adjusting the modulus of elasticity and self-weight of concrete. The slab is modelled by using 2D slabelements, allowing for efficient and relatively fast examination of structural behaviour and FEM analysis in ANSYS WorkbenchMechanical, where voids are modelled within a 3D solid representation of the entire slab. This approach should provide thebest representation of a real structure as it models all its elements with their respective physical attributes. Results of FEManalyses would be compared not only to each other, but also with results of manual calculations, if possible. Calculations thatare going to be used are based on the method of strips, a traditional approach for analysing deflection of reinforced concreteslabs. The comparative analysis encompasses calculations of deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs with variousgeometrical properties and boundary conditions. The findings aim to contribute to the engineering community by elucidatingthe strengths, limitations, and trade-offs associated with each respective type of FEM analysis, as well as manual calculations,when it comes to assessing the deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Inżynieria Mineralna
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29227/im-2024-02-3
Primary Topic
Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ocena porównawcza ugięć płyt żelbetowych z pustkami: Analiza MES i obliczenia ręczne

Daniel Beutelhauser, Norbert Jendželovský
Inżynieria Mineralna
Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
article

Ocena porównawcza ugięć płyt żelbetowych z pustkami: Analiza MES i obliczenia ręczne

Daniel Beutelhauser, Norbert Jendželovský
article en

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive comparative study of deflection voided reinforced concrete slabs, evaluating the resultsobtained through Finite Element Method (FEM) analyses of various accuracy and manual calculations, specifically employingthe method of strips. Distinct methodologies used for analysis are: FEM analysis using SCIA Engineer, where voids in the slabare accounted for by adjusting the modulus of elasticity and self-weight of concrete. The slab is modelled by using 2D slabelements, allowing for efficient and relatively fast examination of structural behaviour and FEM analysis in ANSYS WorkbenchMechanical, where voids are modelled within a 3D solid representation of the entire slab. This approach should provide thebest representation of a real structure as it models all its elements with their respective physical attributes. Results of FEManalyses would be compared not only to each other, but also with results of manual calculations, if possible. Calculations thatare going to be used are based on the method of strips, a traditional approach for analysing deflection of reinforced concreteslabs. The comparative analysis encompasses calculations of deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs with variousgeometrical properties and boundary conditions. The findings aim to contribute to the engineering community by elucidatingthe strengths, limitations, and trade-offs associated with each respective type of FEM analysis, as well as manual calculations,when it comes to assessing the deflection of voided reinforced concrete slabs.

Inżynieria MineralnaVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.