Student Perspectives on Enhancing Hybrid Doctoral Education (On Site and Online)

An increasing number of studies incorporate doctoral students’ perspectives to enhance programs. However, research specifically addressing these perspectives in hybrid doctoral education remains limited. The objective of this study was to analyze the strengths and challenges perceived in a doctoral program based on students’ experiential testimonies and to identify dynamic cores that contributed to the enhancement of hybrid doctoral education. The study adopted a qualitative approach with the deployment of the descriptive phenomenological method; 190 students on the doctoral program in Education at a private university in Lima, Peru, participated. A virtual interview was used as a method. Six cores were revealed: technological, pedagogical, and disciplinary integration in the doctorate, doctoral supervision, specialized support in research and scientific publication, the development of transversal competencies, organizational infrastructure, and student agency and emotional climate in the doctoral program. These dynamic cores provide a comprehensive framework that encapsulates both the challenges and strengths of hybrid doctoral education, offering key insights for its improvement and innovation. As this study moves beyond a fragmented analysis of specific aspects, it contributes to a more integrated and holistic understanding of hybrid doctoral education, paving the way toward a comprehensive model. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040416
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student Perspectives on Enhancing Hybrid Doctoral Education (On Site and Online)

Edith Soria-Valencia, Ángel Deroncele-Acosta, María de los Ángeles Sánchez Trujillo, Omar Bellido-Valdiviezo
2 citations
Education Sciences
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
5.63
article

Student Perspectives on Enhancing Hybrid Doctoral Education (On Site and Online)

Edith Soria-Valencia, Ángel Deroncele-Acosta, María de los Ángeles Sánchez Trujillo, Omar Bellido-Valdiviezo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

An increasing number of studies incorporate doctoral students’ perspectives to enhance programs. However, research specifically addressing these perspectives in hybrid doctoral education remains limited. The objective of this study was to analyze the strengths and challenges perceived in a doctoral program based on students’ experiential testimonies and to identify dynamic cores that contributed to the enhancement of hybrid doctoral education. The study adopted a qualitative approach with the deployment of the descriptive phenomenological method; 190 students on the doctoral program in Education at a private university in Lima, Peru, participated. A virtual interview was used as a method. Six cores were revealed: technological, pedagogical, and disciplinary integration in the doctorate, doctoral supervision, specialized support in research and scientific publication, the development of transversal competencies, organizational infrastructure, and student agency and emotional climate in the doctoral program. These dynamic cores provide a comprehensive framework that encapsulates both the challenges and strengths of hybrid doctoral education, offering key insights for its improvement and innovation. As this study moves beyond a fragmented analysis of specific aspects, it contributes to a more integrated and holistic understanding of hybrid doctoral education, paving the way toward a comprehensive model. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.

Education SciencesVol. 15(4)
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.