Comparative Analysis of Laboratory Markers, Severity Scores, and Outcomes in 179 Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

<b>Background and Objectives</b>: Severe acute pancreatitis carries a substantial risk of complications and death. Prompt identification of prognostic factors is crucial to optimize management and reduce mortality. This study aims to compare inflammatory scores, laboratory markers, and clinical outcomes between survivors and non-survivors with severe acute pancreatitis, drawing on data from 179 patients admitted between 2017 and 2024. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 179 patients diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis. Of these, 55 patient records were extracted from an existing database, and an additional 124 were included from hospital archives (2017-2024). We divided participants into survivors (<i>n</i> = 121) and non-survivors (<i>n</i> = 58). Clinical data were obtained from medical records, including demographic information, comorbidities, laboratory markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)), and severity scores (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI), and Ranson). <b>Results</b>: Non-survivors had significantly higher ages (mean of 66.4 vs. 52.7 years, <i>p</i> = 0.002), elevated inflammatory markers (median NLR of 14.2 vs. 10.3, <i>p</i> = 0.031), and more frequent multiorgan failure (75.9% vs. 31.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The timing of intervention before 28 days was associated with higher mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Chronic kidney disease and advanced cardiovascular comorbidities independently predicted worse survival (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The mortality rate in this cohort was 32.4%. Logistic regression identified age >60 years with an odds ratio (OR = 2.9), multiple organ failure (OR = 4.1), and high severity scores as primary contributors to mortality. <b>Conclusions</b>: Advanced age, comorbidities, elevated inflammatory markers, and multiple organ failure significantly impact mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. Delaying major interventions when feasible, optimizing perioperative care, and early recognition of high-risk patients may improve outcomes. Further research should explore targeted management strategies for high-risk groups and refine the role of delayed or minimally invasive approaches in severe acute pancreatitis management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040797
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Laboratory Markers, Severity Scores, and Outcomes in 179 Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Claudia Borza, Dan Brebu, Cătălin Alexandru Pîrvu, Tudorel Mihoc et al.
4 citations
Biomedicines
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
8.03
article

Comparative Analysis of Laboratory Markers, Severity Scores, and Outcomes in 179 Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Claudia Borza, Dan Brebu, Cătălin Alexandru Pîrvu, Tudorel Mihoc, Amadeus Dobrescu, M. Cara, Ștelian Pantea, A Macovei, Patrick Dumitrescu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background and Objectives</b>: Severe acute pancreatitis carries a substantial risk of complications and death. Prompt identification of prognostic factors is crucial to optimize management and reduce mortality. This study aims to compare inflammatory scores, laboratory markers, and clinical outcomes between survivors and non-survivors with severe acute pancreatitis, drawing on data from 179 patients admitted between 2017 and 2024. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 179 patients diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis. Of these, 55 patient records were extracted from an existing database, and an additional 124 were included from hospital archives (2017-2024). We divided participants into survivors (<i>n</i> = 121) and non-survivors (<i>n</i> = 58). Clinical data were obtained from medical records, including demographic information, comorbidities, laboratory markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)), and severity scores (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI), and Ranson). <b>Results</b>: Non-survivors had significantly higher ages (mean of 66.4 vs. 52.7 years, <i>p</i> = 0.002), elevated inflammatory markers (median NLR of 14.2 vs. 10.3, <i>p</i> = 0.031), and more frequent multiorgan failure (75.9% vs. 31.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The timing of intervention before 28 days was associated with higher mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Chronic kidney disease and advanced cardiovascular comorbidities independently predicted worse survival (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The mortality rate in this cohort was 32.4%. Logistic regression identified age >60 years with an odds ratio (OR = 2.9), multiple organ failure (OR = 4.1), and high severity scores as primary contributors to mortality. <b>Conclusions</b>: Advanced age, comorbidities, elevated inflammatory markers, and multiple organ failure significantly impact mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. Delaying major interventions when feasible, optimizing perioperative care, and early recognition of high-risk patients may improve outcomes. Further research should explore targeted management strategies for high-risk groups and refine the role of delayed or minimally invasive approaches in severe acute pancreatitis management.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(4)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
8.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.