Reliability and Accuracy of Linear Position Transducers During the Bench Press and Back Squat: Implications for Velocity-Based Training

<b>Background:</b> Selecting the right linear position transducer (LPT) for velocity-based training monitoring sometimes presents uncertainties for coaches. <b>Objectives:</b> This study rigorously examined the test-retest reliability of three LPT-Cs using a simultaneous triangulation method of the same device during bench press (BP) and back squat (SQ) exercises performed on a Smith machine. <b>Methods:</b> Forty university students-13 females (23 ± 2 years) and 27 males (31.5 ± 6 years)-voluntarily participated in a randomized repeated-measures study. LPTs were randomly assigned numbers and placed at 5 cm apart to measure and collect bar displacement (∆S), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), peak velocity (PV), and time to peak velocity (T-PV). Each volunteer performed three BP and SQ attempts with pre-standardized loads (males: BP ≥ 40 kg and SQ ≥ 60 kg; females: BP ≥ 25 kg and SQ ≥ 40 kg). <b>Results:</b> The main findings of this study support a high degree of reliability for LPTs. For all variables, the absolute reliability presented significant values (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05), with an intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.995, a 95% confidence interval between 0.992-0.999, a coefficient of variation ≤ 10%, and a standard error of the mean ≤ 0.031. <b>Conclusions:</b> Scientists and coaches can use the LPT device as a reliable tool for monitoring velocity-based training by providing rigorous measurements of ∆S, MPV, PV, and T-PV during BP and SQ exercises. In addition, the smallest real difference reported may be useful in identifying minimal changes in ∆S within a single set (BP = 0.10 cm; SQ = 0.13 cm).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020109
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Accuracy of Linear Position Transducers During the Bench Press and Back Squat: Implications for Velocity-Based Training

Luís Monteiro, Luís Rama, Válter Pinheiro, Pedro Miguel Forte et al.
2 citations
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
article

Reliability and Accuracy of Linear Position Transducers During the Bench Press and Back Squat: Implications for Velocity-Based Training

Luís Monteiro, Luís Rama, Válter Pinheiro, Pedro Miguel Forte, Alex Silva Ribeiro, Raynier Montoro-Bombú, Paulo Malico Sousa, Armando Costa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Selecting the right linear position transducer (LPT) for velocity-based training monitoring sometimes presents uncertainties for coaches. <b>Objectives:</b> This study rigorously examined the test-retest reliability of three LPT-Cs using a simultaneous triangulation method of the same device during bench press (BP) and back squat (SQ) exercises performed on a Smith machine. <b>Methods:</b> Forty university students-13 females (23 ± 2 years) and 27 males (31.5 ± 6 years)-voluntarily participated in a randomized repeated-measures study. LPTs were randomly assigned numbers and placed at 5 cm apart to measure and collect bar displacement (∆S), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), peak velocity (PV), and time to peak velocity (T-PV). Each volunteer performed three BP and SQ attempts with pre-standardized loads (males: BP ≥ 40 kg and SQ ≥ 60 kg; females: BP ≥ 25 kg and SQ ≥ 40 kg). <b>Results:</b> The main findings of this study support a high degree of reliability for LPTs. For all variables, the absolute reliability presented significant values (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05), with an intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.995, a 95% confidence interval between 0.992-0.999, a coefficient of variation ≤ 10%, and a standard error of the mean ≤ 0.031. <b>Conclusions:</b> Scientists and coaches can use the LPT device as a reliable tool for monitoring velocity-based training by providing rigorous measurements of ∆S, MPV, PV, and T-PV during BP and SQ exercises. In addition, the smallest real difference reported may be useful in identifying minimal changes in ∆S within a single set (BP = 0.10 cm; SQ = 0.13 cm).

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(2)
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT), Life Quality Research Centre (PT), Higher Institute of Police Sciences and Homeland Security (PT), University of Coimbra (PT), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.