Team Coordination Breakdowns: Examining Physiological Features Underlying Transitions in Coordination Dynamics

Team coordination breakdowns (TCBs) generally reflect episodes of ineffective team functioning, resulting in suboptimal team performance. Computational identification of TCBs enables us to examine the underlying characteristics of suboptimal performance and to potentially deliver real-time feedback to teams. Especially in time-critical crisis situations, such feedback can be invaluable. Previous studies found difficulties in distinguishing between coordination patterns that indicate TCBs and patterns that indicated other aspects of teamwork (e.g., shifts in tasks or affective behavior). Subsequently, we examined features capturing underlying characteristics of team coordination, based on multiple physiological signals and coordination measures, to identify TCBs. Our multi-methodological approach allowed us to identify features that are important for TCB identification. We also observed that distributions of (coordination-based) feature data related and unrelated to TCBs were significantly different, indicating that the features captured underlying patterns in team coordination data. In addition, our results indicated that team performance, measured as goal achievement duration, is more severely compromised when TCBs lasted longer. By showing a relationship between TCBs and goal achievement duration, as well as understanding the key features of these TCBs, our study contributes to deepening our understanding of TCBs and provides a basis for future research pursuing timely team support interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434251328803
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Team Coordination Breakdowns: Examining Physiological Features Underlying Transitions in Coordination Dynamics

Elwira A. Hałgas, Travis J. Wiltshire, Kyana Hyun Joo van Eijndhoven, Max M. Louwerse et al.
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Team Coordination Breakdowns: Examining Physiological Features Underlying Transitions in Coordination Dynamics

Elwira A. Hałgas, Travis J. Wiltshire, Kyana Hyun Joo van Eijndhoven, Max M. Louwerse, Josette Gevers
article en

Abstract

Team coordination breakdowns (TCBs) generally reflect episodes of ineffective team functioning, resulting in suboptimal team performance. Computational identification of TCBs enables us to examine the underlying characteristics of suboptimal performance and to potentially deliver real-time feedback to teams. Especially in time-critical crisis situations, such feedback can be invaluable. Previous studies found difficulties in distinguishing between coordination patterns that indicate TCBs and patterns that indicated other aspects of teamwork (e.g., shifts in tasks or affective behavior). Subsequently, we examined features capturing underlying characteristics of team coordination, based on multiple physiological signals and coordination measures, to identify TCBs. Our multi-methodological approach allowed us to identify features that are important for TCB identification. We also observed that distributions of (coordination-based) feature data related and unrelated to TCBs were significantly different, indicating that the features captured underlying patterns in team coordination data. In addition, our results indicated that team performance, measured as goal achievement duration, is more severely compromised when TCBs lasted longer. By showing a relationship between TCBs and goal achievement duration, as well as understanding the key features of these TCBs, our study contributes to deepening our understanding of TCBs and provides a basis for future research pursuing timely team support interventions.

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision MakingVol. 19(3)
Tilburg University (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.