Generative AI and Learning Analytics

The rapid adoption of generative AI (GenAI) in education has raised critical questions about its implications for learning and teaching. While GenAI tools offer new avenues for personalized learning, enhanced feedback, and increased efficiency, they also present challenges related to cognitive engagement, student agency, and ethical considerations. Learning analytics (LA) provides a crucial lens to examine how GenAI affects learning behaviours and outcomes by offering data-informed insights into GenAI’s impact on students, educators, and educational ecosystems. Thus, obtained insights allow for evidence-based decision-making aimed at balancing GenAI’s benefits with the need to foster deep learning, creativity, and self-regulation of learning. This special issue of the Journal of Learning Analytics presents 10 research papers that explore the intersection of GenAI and LA, offering diverse perspectives that benefit students, teachers, and researchers. To structure these contributions, we adopt Clow’s generic framework of the LA cycle, categorizing the papers into four key areas: (1) understanding learning and learner contexts, (2) leveraging AI-generated data for learning insights, (3) applying LA methods to generate meaningful insights, and (4) designing interventions that optimize learning outcomes. By bringing together these perspectives, this special issue advances research-informed educational practices that ensure that GenAI’s potential is harnessed responsibly, reinforcing educational goals while safeguarding learners’ autonomy and cognitive development. Collectively, these contributions illustrate the reciprocal relationship between GenAI and LA, demonstrating how each can inform and refine the other. We reflect on the broader implications for LA, including the need to re-examine the boundaries of LA in the presence of GenAI, while preserving key principles from human-centred design and maintaining ethical and privacy standards that are foundational to LA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Learning Analytics
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8961
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and Learning Analytics

Hassan Khosravi, Zachary A. Pardos, Jelena Jovanović, Antonette Shibani et al.
8 citations
Journal of Learning Analytics
Online Learning and Analytics
13.55
article

Generative AI and Learning Analytics

Hassan Khosravi, Zachary A. Pardos, Jelena Jovanović, Antonette Shibani, Lixiang Yan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The rapid adoption of generative AI (GenAI) in education has raised critical questions about its implications for learning and teaching. While GenAI tools offer new avenues for personalized learning, enhanced feedback, and increased efficiency, they also present challenges related to cognitive engagement, student agency, and ethical considerations. Learning analytics (LA) provides a crucial lens to examine how GenAI affects learning behaviours and outcomes by offering data-informed insights into GenAI’s impact on students, educators, and educational ecosystems. Thus, obtained insights allow for evidence-based decision-making aimed at balancing GenAI’s benefits with the need to foster deep learning, creativity, and self-regulation of learning. This special issue of the Journal of Learning Analytics presents 10 research papers that explore the intersection of GenAI and LA, offering diverse perspectives that benefit students, teachers, and researchers. To structure these contributions, we adopt Clow’s generic framework of the LA cycle, categorizing the papers into four key areas: (1) understanding learning and learner contexts, (2) leveraging AI-generated data for learning insights, (3) applying LA methods to generate meaningful insights, and (4) designing interventions that optimize learning outcomes. By bringing together these perspectives, this special issue advances research-informed educational practices that ensure that GenAI’s potential is harnessed responsibly, reinforcing educational goals while safeguarding learners’ autonomy and cognitive development. Collectively, these contributions illustrate the reciprocal relationship between GenAI and LA, demonstrating how each can inform and refine the other. We reflect on the broader implications for LA, including the need to re-examine the boundaries of LA in the presence of GenAI, while preserving key principles from human-centred design and maintaining ethical and privacy standards that are foundational to LA.

Journal of Learning AnalyticsVol. 12(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Belgrade (RS), Monash University (AU), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Online Learning and Analytics
13.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.