Global Developments in Legal Tech and the Pivotal Role of Digital Innovation: Legislative and Governmental Responses in Germany

This paper introduces the state of legal tech development in Germany and outlines the country’s regulatory framework for legal tech. Following a conceptual clarification, the paper examines various legal tech applications used in private law as well as in public law by administrative and law enforcement authorities. It then explores the regulatory framework governing legal tech in Germany, which is largely shaped by EU law and supplemented by national regulations. Overall, the analysis reveals that Germany and the European Union tend to regulate legal tech in a sector-specific manner, aiming to anticipate technological developments through legal norms. In the final section, the paper compares this approach to South Korea’s “principle of adopting technology first and regulating later,” highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each model and exploring how both countries can learn from one another in shaping legal tech regulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Criminal Justice
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36889/ijcj.2024.005
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Developments in Legal Tech and the Pivotal Role of Digital Innovation: Legislative and Governmental Responses in Germany

Jan Henrik Klement, Florian Zenner
International Journal of Criminal Justice
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Global Developments in Legal Tech and the Pivotal Role of Digital Innovation: Legislative and Governmental Responses in Germany

Jan Henrik Klement, Florian Zenner
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces the state of legal tech development in Germany and outlines the country’s regulatory framework for legal tech. Following a conceptual clarification, the paper examines various legal tech applications used in private law as well as in public law by administrative and law enforcement authorities. It then explores the regulatory framework governing legal tech in Germany, which is largely shaped by EU law and supplemented by national regulations. Overall, the analysis reveals that Germany and the European Union tend to regulate legal tech in a sector-specific manner, aiming to anticipate technological developments through legal norms. In the final section, the paper compares this approach to South Korea’s “principle of adopting technology first and regulating later,” highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each model and exploring how both countries can learn from one another in shaping legal tech regulation.

International Journal of Criminal JusticeVol. 6(2)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.