Taming AI with morals? Skeptical notes

If the risks that leading experts say are intrinsic to advanced AI systems are real, then there is little reason to expect that they can be contained, be it by political or ethical means. The reasons are partly to do with the technology itself, partly with the organization of the social world into which it falls, whose understanding is hampered by widely shared myths about governmental capabilities. Successful containment would require global regulation and a level of enforcement that would seem unattainable even in the absence of competing political, military, economic, and scientific interests, which drive AI’s unabated development despite growing awareness of the risks associated with its uncontrolled proliferation. Ethics has its own risks. Inflationary moralization only covers up our puzzlements and anxieties in the face of disquieting uncertainties, while potentially flaring up conflict rather than defusing it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk sciences.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.risk.2025.100016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taming AI with morals? Skeptical notes

Volker H. Schmidt
1 citations
Risk sciences.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Taming AI with morals? Skeptical notes

Volker H. Schmidt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

If the risks that leading experts say are intrinsic to advanced AI systems are real, then there is little reason to expect that they can be contained, be it by political or ethical means. The reasons are partly to do with the technology itself, partly with the organization of the social world into which it falls, whose understanding is hampered by widely shared myths about governmental capabilities. Successful containment would require global regulation and a level of enforcement that would seem unattainable even in the absence of competing political, military, economic, and scientific interests, which drive AI’s unabated development despite growing awareness of the risks associated with its uncontrolled proliferation. Ethics has its own risks. Inflationary moralization only covers up our puzzlements and anxieties in the face of disquieting uncertainties, while potentially flaring up conflict rather than defusing it.

Risk sciences.Vol. 1
National University of Singapore (SG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taming AI with morals? Skeptical notes — Volker H. Schmidt · Risk sciences. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS