Gender Stereotypes in the Creation of Educational Cases with ChatGPT

This study analyzes how ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence tool, reproduces gender stereotypes when creating educational case studies. Through a qualitative analysis of 50 cases, variables such as gender, character role, educational level, position held, and socioeconomic level were examined. The results show that women are more frequently represented in problematic roles, with lower levels of education and in low-ranking positions, while men predominate in problem-solving roles, with postgraduate studies and in leadership positions. These findings underscore the risk of AI perpetuating gender biases present in the data with which it was trained. The study highlights the importance of a critical and conscious use of AI in education to avoid the reproduction of inequalities and promote a more equitable representation of gender in the content generated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ism63611.2024.00059
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Stereotypes in the Creation of Educational Cases with ChatGPT

Gabriel Valerio-Ureña, Giomara Sevilla-Campoverde, Soledad Ortúzar, Christian Lazcano
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Gender Stereotypes in the Creation of Educational Cases with ChatGPT

Gabriel Valerio-Ureña, Giomara Sevilla-Campoverde, Soledad Ortúzar, Christian Lazcano
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes how ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence tool, reproduces gender stereotypes when creating educational case studies. Through a qualitative analysis of 50 cases, variables such as gender, character role, educational level, position held, and socioeconomic level were examined. The results show that women are more frequently represented in problematic roles, with lower levels of education and in low-ranking positions, while men predominate in problem-solving roles, with postgraduate studies and in leadership positions. These findings underscore the risk of AI perpetuating gender biases present in the data with which it was trained. The study highlights the importance of a critical and conscious use of AI in education to avoid the reproduction of inequalities and promote a more equitable representation of gender in the content generated.

Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Institute for the Future (US), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.