Chinese guidelines on acupuncture for post-stroke dysphagia – quality assessment and evidence analysis

<sec><strong>Introduction</strong> Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) set quality standards for effective and safe practices, which should be supported by robust evidence. We aimed to identify and evaluate the quality of current Chinese CPGs regarding the use of acupuncture for post-stroke dysphagia and to compare their supporting evidence. </sec><sec><strong>Methods</strong> Four Chinese databases and two websites were searched to identify relevant CPGs. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Two authors assessed the quality of the identified CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). </sec><sec><strong>Results</strong> After title/abstract and full-text screening, and removal of duplicates and irrelevant CPGs, 13 CPGs remained. The CPGs were published between 2011 and 2024. Moreover, ten guidelines were affiliated with hospitals/universities, while three did not indicate their authors’ affiliations. The CPGs were sponsored by the World Health Organization, professional committees, and the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Among the 13 guidelines, four Western medicine guidelines were published by the same first author (on behalf of the Stroke Association) in 2012, 2017, 2019, and 2023. Evaluation using AGREE II revealed that the quality of the 13 CPGs varied. Specifically, five, two, and six guidelines were graded A, B, and C, respectively. The CPGs were backed by poor and often outdated evidence. Notably, only one CPG was developed by professionals with knowledge regarding acupuncture, eight CPGs were mainly developed by traditional Chinese or integrative medicine doctors, and the remaining four CPGs were developed by Western medicine doctors. </sec><sec><strong>Conclusion</strong> It is important to improve the quality of CPGs and their underlying evidence. Additionally, CPGs should be developed by research methodologists and appropriately qualified clinicians. </sec>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/ecmta.2025.9570002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese guidelines on acupuncture for post-stroke dysphagia – quality assessment and evidence analysis

Nicola Robinson, Yuan Lan, Bin Liu, Yuying Hong et al.
2 citations
Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology Assessment
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
6.24
article

Chinese guidelines on acupuncture for post-stroke dysphagia – quality assessment and evidence analysis

Nicola Robinson, Yuan Lan, Bin Liu, Yuying Hong, Ziyu Tian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<sec><strong>Introduction</strong> Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) set quality standards for effective and safe practices, which should be supported by robust evidence. We aimed to identify and evaluate the quality of current Chinese CPGs regarding the use of acupuncture for post-stroke dysphagia and to compare their supporting evidence. </sec><sec><strong>Methods</strong> Four Chinese databases and two websites were searched to identify relevant CPGs. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Two authors assessed the quality of the identified CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). </sec><sec><strong>Results</strong> After title/abstract and full-text screening, and removal of duplicates and irrelevant CPGs, 13 CPGs remained. The CPGs were published between 2011 and 2024. Moreover, ten guidelines were affiliated with hospitals/universities, while three did not indicate their authors’ affiliations. The CPGs were sponsored by the World Health Organization, professional committees, and the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Among the 13 guidelines, four Western medicine guidelines were published by the same first author (on behalf of the Stroke Association) in 2012, 2017, 2019, and 2023. Evaluation using AGREE II revealed that the quality of the 13 CPGs varied. Specifically, five, two, and six guidelines were graded A, B, and C, respectively. The CPGs were backed by poor and often outdated evidence. Notably, only one CPG was developed by professionals with knowledge regarding acupuncture, eight CPGs were mainly developed by traditional Chinese or integrative medicine doctors, and the remaining four CPGs were developed by Western medicine doctors. </sec><sec><strong>Conclusion</strong> It is important to improve the quality of CPGs and their underlying evidence. Additionally, CPGs should be developed by research methodologists and appropriately qualified clinicians. </sec>

Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine and Technology AssessmentVol. 1(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN), China Association of Acupuncture-Moxibustion (CN)
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
6.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.