One Hundred Years Between Complementary Institutionalist Theoretical Frameworks: Thorstein Veblen And Geoffrey Hodgson

In this article, we seek to present complementarities between the main theoretical-analytical categories, approached by Thorstein Veblen and Geoffrey Hodgson, representatives, respectively, of Old North American Institucionalism and Neo-Institucionalism. Particular emphasis is given to institutionalist criticism concerning approaches that advocate the supremacy of the structure over the individual or of the individual over the structure. The alternative proposed by the authors above suggest that both individual can modify existing institutions, and the institutions themselves can affect individual preferences. Habits of thought and behavior emerge as a fundamental category in understanding this alternative proposal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Textos de Economia
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8085.2024.e100974
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Hundred Years Between Complementary Institutionalist Theoretical Frameworks: Thorstein Veblen And Geoffrey Hodgson

Pedro Xavier Silva, Daniele Neuberger, Paola Azevedo, Sílvio Antônio Ferraz Cário
Textos de Economia
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

One Hundred Years Between Complementary Institutionalist Theoretical Frameworks: Thorstein Veblen And Geoffrey Hodgson

Pedro Xavier Silva, Daniele Neuberger, Paola Azevedo, Sílvio Antônio Ferraz Cário
article en

Abstract

In this article, we seek to present complementarities between the main theoretical-analytical categories, approached by Thorstein Veblen and Geoffrey Hodgson, representatives, respectively, of Old North American Institucionalism and Neo-Institucionalism. Particular emphasis is given to institutionalist criticism concerning approaches that advocate the supremacy of the structure over the individual or of the individual over the structure. The alternative proposed by the authors above suggest that both individual can modify existing institutions, and the institutions themselves can affect individual preferences. Habits of thought and behavior emerge as a fundamental category in understanding this alternative proposal.

Textos de EconomiaVol. 27(1)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.