The market ecosystem in the age of algorithms: An analysis of trading dynamics and market quality

Abstract This paper examines the impact of algorithmic trading on market quality using a unique NASDAQ OMX Nordic dataset from 2010–2011. We classify traders into algorithmic, institutional, professional, and retail categories. Using two-way fixed effects models and instrumental variables estimation, we find that algorithmic traders enhance liquidity by reducing bid-ask spreads by 0.28 basis points relative to retail traders, with similar effects from institutional traders. These effects persist during high volatility periods, while professional traders are associated with wider spreads. Surprisingly, retail traders emerge as significant liquidity providers, while algorithmic traders exhibit higher order cancellation rates. These findings contribute to the debate on algorithmic trading's role in modern markets and offer implications for market design and regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics and Finance
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-024-09702-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The market ecosystem in the age of algorithms: An analysis of trading dynamics and market quality

Sergey Osmekhin, Andrei Nikiforov, John Paul Broussard
1 citations
Journal of Economics and Finance
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
article

The market ecosystem in the age of algorithms: An analysis of trading dynamics and market quality

Sergey Osmekhin, Andrei Nikiforov, John Paul Broussard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the impact of algorithmic trading on market quality using a unique NASDAQ OMX Nordic dataset from 2010–2011. We classify traders into algorithmic, institutional, professional, and retail categories. Using two-way fixed effects models and instrumental variables estimation, we find that algorithmic traders enhance liquidity by reducing bid-ask spreads by 0.28 basis points relative to retail traders, with similar effects from institutional traders. These effects persist during high volatility periods, while professional traders are associated with wider spreads. Surprisingly, retail traders emerge as significant liquidity providers, while algorithmic traders exhibit higher order cancellation rates. These findings contribute to the debate on algorithmic trading's role in modern markets and offer implications for market design and regulation.

Journal of Economics and FinanceVol. 49(2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Estonian Business School (EE), Tallinn University (EE), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Hanken School of Economics (FI)
Nasdaq OMX, Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö, Fulbright Suomi -säätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The market ecosystem in the age of algorithms: An analysis of trading dynamics and market quality — Sergey Osmekhin, Andrei Nikiforov, et al. · Journal of Economics and Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS