Additive Manufacturing of Copper—A Survey on Current Needs and Challenges

Additive manufacturing (AM) of copper is subject to dynamic development regarding available processes and the quality of produced parts. While challenging, AM processes for copper provide parts with a quality comparable to other metallic material groups like steels. The reasons for the lower prevalence of additive manufacturing of copper components in industrial applications are currently not sufficiently researched, especially in light of the significant progress made in the maturity of this technology. A survey is used to investigate the assessments of protagonists in the field of copper AM. The needs of current and potential users of copper AM are analyzed and outlined. This study reveals that the most relevant technical limitation for users is the reduced surface quality of parts, while overall processes need to become less costly and more reliable to find broader use. Answers given hint to a higher degree of automation, the possibility of multi-material processing, and the upscaling of machine and part sizes as relevant future trends in the copper AM sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9040109
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additive Manufacturing of Copper—A Survey on Current Needs and Challenges

Eckhard Kirchner, Michel Fett, Moritz Benedikt Schäfle, Jeffrey W. Gartner
3 citations
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
article

Additive Manufacturing of Copper—A Survey on Current Needs and Challenges

Eckhard Kirchner, Michel Fett, Moritz Benedikt Schäfle, Jeffrey W. Gartner
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) of copper is subject to dynamic development regarding available processes and the quality of produced parts. While challenging, AM processes for copper provide parts with a quality comparable to other metallic material groups like steels. The reasons for the lower prevalence of additive manufacturing of copper components in industrial applications are currently not sufficiently researched, especially in light of the significant progress made in the maturity of this technology. A survey is used to investigate the assessments of protagonists in the field of copper AM. The needs of current and potential users of copper AM are analyzed and outlined. This study reveals that the most relevant technical limitation for users is the reduced surface quality of parts, while overall processes need to become less costly and more reliable to find broader use. Answers given hint to a higher degree of automation, the possibility of multi-material processing, and the upscaling of machine and part sizes as relevant future trends in the copper AM sector.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 9(4)
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Additive Manufacturing of Copper—A Survey on Current Needs and Challenges — Eckhard Kirchner, Michel Fett, et al. · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS