Obscuring New Testament Slavery: A Study of the Translation History of Δοῦλος

Abstract Translations of the New Testament have historically rendered the word δοῦλος as servant instead of slave, even if δοῦλος is not an ambiguous term. In more recent translations, δοῦλος is increasingly, but still not consistently, translated as slave. The effect of these translations has been to obscure slavery in early Christianity and to overlook the political and colonial legacy of the Bible in legitimising (colonial) slavery. This article provides an overview of translations in English, German, Dutch, Danish, and Norwegian from the Middle Ages to contemporary Bible editions. It shows that the way δοῦλος is translated extends beyond philological analyses of the Greek term or historical reconstructions of slavery in early Christianity, but ties in with the political discourses of slavery, for instance debates about colonial slavery and abolition. In the article, we argue that translating δοῦλος as slave could encourage a much-needed discussion about NT slavery and its legacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Bible and its Reception
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbr-2024-0002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obscuring New Testament Slavery: A Study of the Translation History of Δοῦλος

Martijn Stoutjesdijk, Anders Martinsen
1 citations
Journal of the Bible and its Reception
Historical and Linguistic Studies
4.20
article

Obscuring New Testament Slavery: A Study of the Translation History of Δοῦλος

Martijn Stoutjesdijk, Anders Martinsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Translations of the New Testament have historically rendered the word δοῦλος as servant instead of slave, even if δοῦλος is not an ambiguous term. In more recent translations, δοῦλος is increasingly, but still not consistently, translated as slave. The effect of these translations has been to obscure slavery in early Christianity and to overlook the political and colonial legacy of the Bible in legitimising (colonial) slavery. This article provides an overview of translations in English, German, Dutch, Danish, and Norwegian from the Middle Ages to contemporary Bible editions. It shows that the way δοῦλος is translated extends beyond philological analyses of the Greek term or historical reconstructions of slavery in early Christianity, but ties in with the political discourses of slavery, for instance debates about colonial slavery and abolition. In the article, we argue that translating δοῦλος as slave could encourage a much-needed discussion about NT slavery and its legacy.

Journal of the Bible and its ReceptionVol. 12(1)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Protestant Theological University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Obscuring New Testament Slavery: A Study of the Translation History of Δοῦλος — Martijn Stoutjesdijk, Anders Martinsen · Journal of the Bible and its Reception (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS