Differentiating Human Enhancement and Transhumanism: Better or Perfect?

Philosophical concern for the human future is more important today than ever because of the ethical, social, and technological challenges we face—Human Enhancement (HE) and Transhumanism (H+) are some of the theories that are involved with the future of our species. These two positions tend to be confused, but we contend that a distinction can and should be made between the two approaches. To perform this explanation, we propose two axes of differentiation: the concept of enhancement itself and the valuation of the biological body. In this context, H+ begins with a disregard for the body and seeks to transcend the human condition with exponential enhancements, while HE advocates a gradual enhancement within our current limits. Clarifying this contrast between H+ and HE is vital for the responsible adoption of future technologies, enabling informed decisions about which scientific promises are viable and worthy of support, and which should be reconsidered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia et Fides
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12775/setf.2025.007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiating Human Enhancement and Transhumanism: Better or Perfect?

Pablo García‐Barranquero, Marcos Alonso Fernández
1 citations
Scientia et Fides
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
article

Differentiating Human Enhancement and Transhumanism: Better or Perfect?

Pablo García‐Barranquero, Marcos Alonso Fernández
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Philosophical concern for the human future is more important today than ever because of the ethical, social, and technological challenges we face—Human Enhancement (HE) and Transhumanism (H+) are some of the theories that are involved with the future of our species. These two positions tend to be confused, but we contend that a distinction can and should be made between the two approaches. To perform this explanation, we propose two axes of differentiation: the concept of enhancement itself and the valuation of the biological body. In this context, H+ begins with a disregard for the body and seeks to transcend the human condition with exponential enhancements, while HE advocates a gradual enhancement within our current limits. Clarifying this contrast between H+ and HE is vital for the responsible adoption of future technologies, enabling informed decisions about which scientific promises are viable and worthy of support, and which should be reconsidered.

Scientia et FidesVol. 13(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differentiating Human Enhancement and Transhumanism: Better or Perfect? — Pablo García‐Barranquero, Marcos Alonso Fernández · Scientia et Fides (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS