Clinical and Ultrasound Semiotics of Varicose Vein Recurrence

Objective. To study clinical and ultrasound semiotics of primary varicose vein recurrence after invasive treatment. Material and methods. We analyzed 64 consecutive patients with varicose vein recurrence after invasive treatment (crossectomy, stripping (35 patients) and thermal obliteration (27 patients)). Ehere were 21 men (32.8%) and 43 women (67.2%) (mean age 50.8±1.6). Recurrence variants and their combinations were analyzed. Reflux sources were recorded in accordance with the REVAS classification. We estimated time interval after surgery, period between surgery and recurrence, the number of invasive interventions, localization of recurrent varicose veins, including their relationship with sites of previous interventions, CEAP class. Results. The median period after invasive treatment was 53 months. Recurrence within the area of previous procedure was registered in 14 patients (21.9%), outside these areas — in 11 patients (17.2%). Combined localization was revealed in 39 patients (60.9%). Recurrence due to disease progression was detected in 11 patients (17.2%), residual veins — in 2 patients (3.1%), recurrent veins — in 3 patients (4.7%), combination — in 48 patients (75%). Neovascularization was detected in 11 patients (17.2%). One source of reflux out of seven possible according to the REVAS classification was detected only in 7 patients (10.9%). Other 57 (89.1%) ones had two or more sources. Trunk insufficiency was detected in 53 patients (82.8%). Incompetent segments of the main saphenous veins after open and endovenous procedures were detected in 11 and 24 patients, respectively (35%/54.7%). Insufficiency of veins that were intact before the first procedure was detected in 18 (28.1%) patients. When analyzing the subgroups after high ligation with stripping and thermal ablation, we found significant differences in time after the first procedure, localization of recurrent varicose veins, incidence of trunk incompetence and previous treatment mistakes. Conclusion. The structure of recurrences is similar after high ligation with stripping and thermal obliteration with phlebectomy. Differences in rates of certain recurrence are probably associated with tactical and technical features of two treatment approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Venous Disorders
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo20251901128
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Ultrasound Semiotics of Varicose Vein Recurrence

E.K. Gavrilov, Г. Г. Хубулава, R. A. Akhadov, E. A. Babinets et al.
1 citations
Journal of Venous Disorders
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
2.01
article

Clinical and Ultrasound Semiotics of Varicose Vein Recurrence

E.K. Gavrilov, Г. Г. Хубулава, R. A. Akhadov, E. A. Babinets, А.С. Артемова
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective. To study clinical and ultrasound semiotics of primary varicose vein recurrence after invasive treatment. Material and methods. We analyzed 64 consecutive patients with varicose vein recurrence after invasive treatment (crossectomy, stripping (35 patients) and thermal obliteration (27 patients)). Ehere were 21 men (32.8%) and 43 women (67.2%) (mean age 50.8±1.6). Recurrence variants and their combinations were analyzed. Reflux sources were recorded in accordance with the REVAS classification. We estimated time interval after surgery, period between surgery and recurrence, the number of invasive interventions, localization of recurrent varicose veins, including their relationship with sites of previous interventions, CEAP class. Results. The median period after invasive treatment was 53 months. Recurrence within the area of previous procedure was registered in 14 patients (21.9%), outside these areas — in 11 patients (17.2%). Combined localization was revealed in 39 patients (60.9%). Recurrence due to disease progression was detected in 11 patients (17.2%), residual veins — in 2 patients (3.1%), recurrent veins — in 3 patients (4.7%), combination — in 48 patients (75%). Neovascularization was detected in 11 patients (17.2%). One source of reflux out of seven possible according to the REVAS classification was detected only in 7 patients (10.9%). Other 57 (89.1%) ones had two or more sources. Trunk insufficiency was detected in 53 patients (82.8%). Incompetent segments of the main saphenous veins after open and endovenous procedures were detected in 11 and 24 patients, respectively (35%/54.7%). Insufficiency of veins that were intact before the first procedure was detected in 18 (28.1%) patients. When analyzing the subgroups after high ligation with stripping and thermal ablation, we found significant differences in time after the first procedure, localization of recurrent varicose veins, incidence of trunk incompetence and previous treatment mistakes. Conclusion. The structure of recurrences is similar after high ligation with stripping and thermal obliteration with phlebectomy. Differences in rates of certain recurrence are probably associated with tactical and technical features of two treatment approaches.

Journal of Venous DisordersVol. 19(1)
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy (RU), St. Petersburg State Health Care Foundation "Mariinsky City Hospital" (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.