Challenging the norm – cull rates and farm economics

Culling has often been seen as removal of cows from the herd that were either too broken or did not pay for their feed cost anymore. This norm on cull rates may be challenged in several different ways. First, cow replacement rates are primarily the result of how many heifers have been raised to enter the herd. In closed herds, this decision starts at breeding with the as­signment of semen types (sexed or conventional, dairy or beef) some 33 months before the heifer calves. Second, continuous improvements in health, fertility and milk production through management and genetics remain important. This makes for more profitable cows that can stay in herds longer. However, if there is sufficient variation among cows, it will remain a good decision to replace the least profitable cows sooner rather than later. A longer productive life (lower replacement rate) is there­fore not necessarily better. Third, there is still quite a bit of work to be done to better support the most profitable replace­ment decisions. Better replacement decisions, in turn, will drive how many heifers are needed and therefore what the opti­mal cull rate will be.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/aabppro20249091
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging the norm – cull rates and farm economics

A. Courtney DeVries
American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings
Agricultural Economics and Policy
article

Challenging the norm – cull rates and farm economics

A. Courtney DeVries
article en

Abstract

Culling has often been seen as removal of cows from the herd that were either too broken or did not pay for their feed cost anymore. This norm on cull rates may be challenged in several different ways. First, cow replacement rates are primarily the result of how many heifers have been raised to enter the herd. In closed herds, this decision starts at breeding with the as­signment of semen types (sexed or conventional, dairy or beef) some 33 months before the heifer calves. Second, continuous improvements in health, fertility and milk production through management and genetics remain important. This makes for more profitable cows that can stay in herds longer. However, if there is sufficient variation among cows, it will remain a good decision to replace the least profitable cows sooner rather than later. A longer productive life (lower replacement rate) is there­fore not necessarily better. Third, there is still quite a bit of work to be done to better support the most profitable replace­ment decisions. Better replacement decisions, in turn, will drive how many heifers are needed and therefore what the opti­mal cull rate will be.

American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsVol. 58(58)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.