Around a Hundred Measures of the Major Personality Disorders

Abstract: The assessment and classification of the personality disorders (PDs) has attracted considerable debate for nearly 50 years, particularly over the last decade. Psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychometricians have attempted to devise valid, self-report measures of each of the PDs, as well as reliable interview schedules. This paper provides a hopefully, comprehensive listing of the instruments designed to assess specific, individual PDs as described in DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5, focused on traditional specific PD constructs. There remains however much debate as to the comprehensiveness of each test in measuring all the distinct facets of a PD, or indeed whether the test is assessing only symptoms rather than the full range of agreed behaviors defining a PD. There was great range in the tests available to measure each PD, ranging from one to assess Passive-Aggressive PD, to twenty-three to assess Borderline PD. The aim is to provide an up-to-date listing, and description, of the current, measures of individual PDs. A list of possible selection criteria for choosing a test is offered. The move to dimensional, as opposed to categorical, assessment of all the PDs is noted. Limitations are acknowledged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000888
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Around a Hundred Measures of the Major Personality Disorders

Adrian F Furnham, Charlotte Robinson
2 citations
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
4.61
article

Around a Hundred Measures of the Major Personality Disorders

Adrian F Furnham, Charlotte Robinson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The assessment and classification of the personality disorders (PDs) has attracted considerable debate for nearly 50 years, particularly over the last decade. Psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychometricians have attempted to devise valid, self-report measures of each of the PDs, as well as reliable interview schedules. This paper provides a hopefully, comprehensive listing of the instruments designed to assess specific, individual PDs as described in DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5, focused on traditional specific PD constructs. There remains however much debate as to the comprehensiveness of each test in measuring all the distinct facets of a PD, or indeed whether the test is assessing only symptoms rather than the full range of agreed behaviors defining a PD. There was great range in the tests available to measure each PD, ranging from one to assess Passive-Aggressive PD, to twenty-three to assess Borderline PD. The aim is to provide an up-to-date listing, and description, of the current, measures of individual PDs. A list of possible selection criteria for choosing a test is offered. The move to dimensional, as opposed to categorical, assessment of all the PDs is noted. Limitations are acknowledged.

European Journal of Psychological Assessment
BI Norwegian Business School (NO), Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.