Integrating Hydrological and Hydraulic Approaches for Adaptive Environmental Flow Management: A Multi-Method Approach for Adaptive River Management in Semi-Arid Regions

In this research, different hydrological and hydraulic methods were employed to estimate the environmental flow demands of the Sofi Chay River, Iran. In total, 50 years (1969–2018) of flow data exhibited high variability with a mean annual flow of 9.37 m3/s and standard deviation of 42.15 m3/s. Hydrological techniques included Tennant, Flow Duration Curve, and Range of Variability Approach; recommended minimum flows ranged from 0.53 to 2.66 m3/s, respectively, or in other words, 10–50% of mean annual flow. In contrast, hydraulic techniques such as Wetted Perimeter, R2CROSS, and Hydraulic Habitat Simulation suggested higher flows of 1.60–5.38 m3/s, or 30–101% of mean annual flow. The Hydraulic Habitat Simulation Method provided a maximum Weighted Usable Area for target species at the flow of 5.38 m3/s. Sediment analysis showed that there was a power relationship between discharge and SSC, where SSC = 14.23 × Q1.68 and R2 = 0.99. Integration of methods yielded a proposed environmental flow regime of base flows of 1.5–2.5 m3/s during the dry season and 3.0–5.0 m3/s during the wet season, with small floods contributing 15.0–20.0 m3/s and large floods > 35.0 m3/s to maintain channel morphology and ecosystem functions. After realizing the need to incorporate all the approaches in the environmental flow assessment, the hydraulic methods consistently recommended higher flows than the hydrologic methods. An adaptive management framework has been put forward for implementing and refining these recommendations to ensure long-term ecosystem health, coupled with meeting human water needs within the Sofi Chay River basin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17070926
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Hydrological and Hydraulic Approaches for Adaptive Environmental Flow Management: A Multi-Method Approach for Adaptive River Management in Semi-Arid Regions

Hazi Mohammad Azamathulla, Jafar Chabokpour, Vishwanadham Mandala, Bimlesh Kumar et al.
2 citations
Water
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
article

Integrating Hydrological and Hydraulic Approaches for Adaptive Environmental Flow Management: A Multi-Method Approach for Adaptive River Management in Semi-Arid Regions

Hazi Mohammad Azamathulla, Jafar Chabokpour, Vishwanadham Mandala, Bimlesh Kumar, Srinivas Kalisetty, Murali Malempati, Kishore Challa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this research, different hydrological and hydraulic methods were employed to estimate the environmental flow demands of the Sofi Chay River, Iran. In total, 50 years (1969–2018) of flow data exhibited high variability with a mean annual flow of 9.37 m3/s and standard deviation of 42.15 m3/s. Hydrological techniques included Tennant, Flow Duration Curve, and Range of Variability Approach; recommended minimum flows ranged from 0.53 to 2.66 m3/s, respectively, or in other words, 10–50% of mean annual flow. In contrast, hydraulic techniques such as Wetted Perimeter, R2CROSS, and Hydraulic Habitat Simulation suggested higher flows of 1.60–5.38 m3/s, or 30–101% of mean annual flow. The Hydraulic Habitat Simulation Method provided a maximum Weighted Usable Area for target species at the flow of 5.38 m3/s. Sediment analysis showed that there was a power relationship between discharge and SSC, where SSC = 14.23 × Q1.68 and R2 = 0.99. Integration of methods yielded a proposed environmental flow regime of base flows of 1.5–2.5 m3/s during the dry season and 3.0–5.0 m3/s during the wet season, with small floods contributing 15.0–20.0 m3/s and large floods > 35.0 m3/s to maintain channel morphology and ecosystem functions. After realizing the need to incorporate all the approaches in the environmental flow assessment, the hydraulic methods consistently recommended higher flows than the hydrologic methods. An adaptive management framework has been put forward for implementing and refining these recommendations to ensure long-term ecosystem health, coupled with meeting human water needs within the Sofi Chay River basin.

WaterVol. 17(7)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN), University of Maragheh (IR), University of the West Indies (TT), Mastercard (United States) (US), Cummins (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.