Development of an external quality assurance (EQA) structure to evaluate the quality of genetic pathology reporting

A standard for reporting genetic pathology results currently does not exist as a consensus. While effective reports are produced, there is lack of consistency on which details to present or to emphasise, and the ultimate report often reflects an individual practitioner's preferences derived from anecdotal experience. Genetic knowledge is complex, so poor and/or inconsistent reporting could make the application of pathology results to patient management more challenging than necessary. The aim of this study was to combine expert knowledge with machine learning (ML) applications to design a template to encourage consistent and accurate genetic reporting. To investigate genetic reporting quality within Australasia, past melanoma genetics reports produced in response to RCPA Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) audits were compiled for retrospective text analyses to determine word frequencies and patterns. These text pattern analyses were supported by an investigation of reporting criteria consistency for solid tumours, as well as a narrative review of the broader literature, by a genetic pathology expert to contextualise these results, with the ultimate results combined into a suggested template. These results will be augmented via further ML studies on report structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinica Chimica Acta
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120263
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an external quality assurance (EQA) structure to evaluate the quality of genetic pathology reporting

Sze Yee Chai, Brett Andrew Lidbury, Tony Badrick, Jason Tseung et al.
1 citations
Clinica Chimica Acta
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
article

Development of an external quality assurance (EQA) structure to evaluate the quality of genetic pathology reporting

Sze Yee Chai, Brett Andrew Lidbury, Tony Badrick, Jason Tseung, Maddison Frogley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A standard for reporting genetic pathology results currently does not exist as a consensus. While effective reports are produced, there is lack of consistency on which details to present or to emphasise, and the ultimate report often reflects an individual practitioner's preferences derived from anecdotal experience. Genetic knowledge is complex, so poor and/or inconsistent reporting could make the application of pathology results to patient management more challenging than necessary. The aim of this study was to combine expert knowledge with machine learning (ML) applications to design a template to encourage consistent and accurate genetic reporting. To investigate genetic reporting quality within Australasia, past melanoma genetics reports produced in response to RCPA Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) audits were compiled for retrospective text analyses to determine word frequencies and patterns. These text pattern analyses were supported by an investigation of reporting criteria consistency for solid tumours, as well as a narrative review of the broader literature, by a genetic pathology expert to contextualise these results, with the ultimate results combined into a suggested template. These results will be augmented via further ML studies on report structure.

Clinica Chimica ActaVol. 572
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development of an external quality assurance (EQA) structure to evaluate the quality of genetic pathology reporting — Sze Yee Chai, Brett Andrew Lidbury, et al. · Clinica Chimica Acta (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS