Students’ Reflections on Grammarly as a Tool for Academic Writing Support: Perceived Knowledge and Challenges in Higher Education

The advancement of technology has led to the widespread use of AI-based tools in education, enhancing learning processes across various skills. While AI is being integrated into many areas, its application in the assessment of writing skills, such as through Grammarly, is still emerging, offering more accurate and efficient evaluations. This study explores students' perceived knowledge of the use of Grammarly in academic writing, it aims to provide an overview of academic writing skills including its challenges. Employing a qualitative research approach with a survey design, the study involved 120 English Department students of private who enrolled Writing course using the premium version of Grammarly. Data collection methods included online closed-ended questionnaires and online semi-structured interviews to ensure a comprehensive range of responses. The findings indicate that most students believe Grammarly helps them independently correct their academic writing. The most frequently used feature is 'correctness,' primarily for grammar and spelling corrections, while the least used is 'plagiarism detection.' However, several features, including writing context, punctuation, spelling, passive voice, and plagiarism detection, were found to be occasionally inaccurate. To address these inaccuracies, students employed strategies such as proofreading, consulting dictionaries, using Google or other applications, seeking help from peers and lecturers, and reading suggestion descriptions carefully. Despite these limitations, students reported gaining knowledge in writing mechanics, vocabulary enhancement, self-awareness, and self-confidence through Grammarly. They found that feedback from lecturers, peers, and Grammarly complemented each other in writing classes. It is important to monitor students' attitudes towards using Grammarly for automatic corrections, highlighting the need for self-assessment to recognize their writing mistakes. This study suggests that integrating technology, specifically AI, into English language teaching (ELT) can significantly benefit writing classes. Further research should examine the impact of incorporating Grammarly into the academic writing process to understand its collaborative role in writing instruction.<p class="Abstract"> </p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scope Journal of English Language Teaching
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.24854
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ Reflections on Grammarly as a Tool for Academic Writing Support: Perceived Knowledge and Challenges in Higher Education

Surya Priambudi, Yulis Setyowati, Galuh Cahya Wijayanti Wijayanti
2 citations
Scope Journal of English Language Teaching
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
7.82
article

Students’ Reflections on Grammarly as a Tool for Academic Writing Support: Perceived Knowledge and Challenges in Higher Education

Surya Priambudi, Yulis Setyowati, Galuh Cahya Wijayanti Wijayanti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The advancement of technology has led to the widespread use of AI-based tools in education, enhancing learning processes across various skills. While AI is being integrated into many areas, its application in the assessment of writing skills, such as through Grammarly, is still emerging, offering more accurate and efficient evaluations. This study explores students' perceived knowledge of the use of Grammarly in academic writing, it aims to provide an overview of academic writing skills including its challenges. Employing a qualitative research approach with a survey design, the study involved 120 English Department students of private who enrolled Writing course using the premium version of Grammarly. Data collection methods included online closed-ended questionnaires and online semi-structured interviews to ensure a comprehensive range of responses. The findings indicate that most students believe Grammarly helps them independently correct their academic writing. The most frequently used feature is 'correctness,' primarily for grammar and spelling corrections, while the least used is 'plagiarism detection.' However, several features, including writing context, punctuation, spelling, passive voice, and plagiarism detection, were found to be occasionally inaccurate. To address these inaccuracies, students employed strategies such as proofreading, consulting dictionaries, using Google or other applications, seeking help from peers and lecturers, and reading suggestion descriptions carefully. Despite these limitations, students reported gaining knowledge in writing mechanics, vocabulary enhancement, self-awareness, and self-confidence through Grammarly. They found that feedback from lecturers, peers, and Grammarly complemented each other in writing classes. It is important to monitor students' attitudes towards using Grammarly for automatic corrections, highlighting the need for self-assessment to recognize their writing mistakes. This study suggests that integrating technology, specifically AI, into English language teaching (ELT) can significantly benefit writing classes. Further research should examine the impact of incorporating Grammarly into the academic writing process to understand its collaborative role in writing instruction.<p class="Abstract"> </p>

Scope Journal of English Language TeachingVol. 9(1)
Universitas Wijaya Putra (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.