Government Expenditures, Economic Growth and Poverty Levels in Nigeria: A Disaggregated Approach

Purpose - This study uses the disaggregation approach to investigate how government spending affects economic growth and poverty levels in Nigeria. The study was anchored on the human capacity theory and two specific objectives were formulated to guide the study. Recent estimates indicate that 67.12% of the Nigerian population is living below one dollar per day. Nationally, 40.7 percent of Nigerians (89 million people) live below the poverty line, while another 25 percent (53 million) are vulnerable (World Bank,2024). Design/methodology/approach - This study using secondary data, this study looks at how different sectors of government expenditures affected poverty and economic growth in Nigeria between 1991 and 2023. Short- and long-run relationships are evaluated using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model, and nonlinear effects are examined using the Threshold Regression Approach. To determine the direction of causality, the study also employs the Granger Causality Test and the Error Correction Model. Originality - The authors here by declare that no generative AI tools, including text-to-image generators and large language models (ChatGPT, COPILOT, etc.), were used in the creation or editing of manuscripts. Findings and Discussion - reveal that while economic growth insignificantly reduces poverty in both the short and long run, government spending does not have a statistically significant impact on poverty in Nigeria. In the short run, recurrent expenditures on agriculture, health, and education negatively but insignificantly affect economic growth, while expenditures on debt servicing and road construction show a negligible positive effect. Poverty will decrease by 0.45 points in the short term and 0.96 points in the long term for every point increase in government spending at the 1% level of significance. The findings did not support the Keynesian theory or Wagner's Law in Nigeria, which found that government spending increases economic growth and it has ability in reducing poverty in an economy. The study concludes that the current economic trajectory in Nigeria cannot be sustained and recommends increased government allocations to priority sectors such as health, education, agriculture, and infrastructure. Conclusion - Based on this finding, we can conclude that the type of government expenditure in Nigeria sectors on (Education, Agriculture and Health) have either been insufficient or have not been effectively and efficiently allocated as its ability to reduce poverty is very low and insignificant. It concludes that the current economic trajectory cannot be sustained and recommends increased government allocations to priority sectors such as health, education, agriculture, and infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58765/ijemr.v3i1.249
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government Expenditures, Economic Growth and Poverty Levels in Nigeria: A Disaggregated Approach

O.F. Akanni, Kehinde Emmanuel Agbeni, Adekoya Yetunde Francisca, Adedoyin Judith Gbadebo et al.
2 citations
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
6.26
article

Government Expenditures, Economic Growth and Poverty Levels in Nigeria: A Disaggregated Approach

O.F. Akanni, Kehinde Emmanuel Agbeni, Adekoya Yetunde Francisca, Adedoyin Judith Gbadebo, Precious Chioma Ejikeme, Obinna Alexander Nwuko, Chima Ezeokolie
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose - This study uses the disaggregation approach to investigate how government spending affects economic growth and poverty levels in Nigeria. The study was anchored on the human capacity theory and two specific objectives were formulated to guide the study. Recent estimates indicate that 67.12% of the Nigerian population is living below one dollar per day. Nationally, 40.7 percent of Nigerians (89 million people) live below the poverty line, while another 25 percent (53 million) are vulnerable (World Bank,2024). Design/methodology/approach - This study using secondary data, this study looks at how different sectors of government expenditures affected poverty and economic growth in Nigeria between 1991 and 2023. Short- and long-run relationships are evaluated using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model, and nonlinear effects are examined using the Threshold Regression Approach. To determine the direction of causality, the study also employs the Granger Causality Test and the Error Correction Model. Originality - The authors here by declare that no generative AI tools, including text-to-image generators and large language models (ChatGPT, COPILOT, etc.), were used in the creation or editing of manuscripts. Findings and Discussion - reveal that while economic growth insignificantly reduces poverty in both the short and long run, government spending does not have a statistically significant impact on poverty in Nigeria. In the short run, recurrent expenditures on agriculture, health, and education negatively but insignificantly affect economic growth, while expenditures on debt servicing and road construction show a negligible positive effect. Poverty will decrease by 0.45 points in the short term and 0.96 points in the long term for every point increase in government spending at the 1% level of significance. The findings did not support the Keynesian theory or Wagner's Law in Nigeria, which found that government spending increases economic growth and it has ability in reducing poverty in an economy. The study concludes that the current economic trajectory in Nigeria cannot be sustained and recommends increased government allocations to priority sectors such as health, education, agriculture, and infrastructure. Conclusion - Based on this finding, we can conclude that the type of government expenditure in Nigeria sectors on (Education, Agriculture and Health) have either been insufficient or have not been effectively and efficiently allocated as its ability to reduce poverty is very low and insignificant. It concludes that the current economic trajectory cannot be sustained and recommends increased government allocations to priority sectors such as health, education, agriculture, and infrastructure.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT REVIEWVol. 3(1)
University of Nigeria (NG), Lagos State University (NG), University of Lagos (NG), Northern Arizona University (US), Babcock University (NG), University of San Francisco (US), Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.