Management and utilization of the Fund for Innovative Medicines: a multistakeholder qualitative survey on regional and local practices

Introduction: The Fund for Innovative Medicines, Fondo Farmaci Innovativi (FFI), enables financing, non-competition, and fast access to innovative medicines. However, limited evidence exists regarding its management processes and the stakeholders involved. In order to identify characteristics, critical issues, and improvement opportunities, this analysis investigates the FFI management processes through the perspective of the Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) involved. Methods: The research employs a qualitative research methodology. A survey administered through interviews to 18 KOLs (clinicians, hospital pharmacists, top hospital managers, and regional pharmaceutical service directors) from 9 Italian regions provided evidence of FFI utilization patterns. The content analysis identified FFI management features, challenges, and best practices. The expert meeting discussion validated the findings and developed consensus priority recommendations. Results: The FFI regulation promotes the convergence between regional and local authorities; however, different regional governance models may determine varying levels of organizational efficiency. Critical interventions were proposed: overall, enhanced AIFA data feedback is supported by 85% of the sample; regionally, strengthened communication with local institutions and centralized planning are recommended (mean score 3.2/4); locally, enhanced digitalization of reporting systems may address operational inefficiencies for clinicians and hospital pharmacists (mean score 3.4/4). Conclusion: This analysis contributed to a better awareness of the current FFI management process through a multi-level and multi-professional methodology. Partial return of data, potential distortions of a fund’s allocation based on usage, multiplication of accounting processes, and regional variability in healthcare governance provide a foundation for targeted improvement interventions and to direct future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2025.3433
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management and utilization of the Fund for Innovative Medicines: a multistakeholder qualitative survey on regional and local practices

Marzia Bonfanti, Andrea Marcellusi, C Lucchetti, Andrea Vitagliano
1 citations
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
article

Management and utilization of the Fund for Innovative Medicines: a multistakeholder qualitative survey on regional and local practices

Marzia Bonfanti, Andrea Marcellusi, C Lucchetti, Andrea Vitagliano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The Fund for Innovative Medicines, Fondo Farmaci Innovativi (FFI), enables financing, non-competition, and fast access to innovative medicines. However, limited evidence exists regarding its management processes and the stakeholders involved. In order to identify characteristics, critical issues, and improvement opportunities, this analysis investigates the FFI management processes through the perspective of the Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) involved. Methods: The research employs a qualitative research methodology. A survey administered through interviews to 18 KOLs (clinicians, hospital pharmacists, top hospital managers, and regional pharmaceutical service directors) from 9 Italian regions provided evidence of FFI utilization patterns. The content analysis identified FFI management features, challenges, and best practices. The expert meeting discussion validated the findings and developed consensus priority recommendations. Results: The FFI regulation promotes the convergence between regional and local authorities; however, different regional governance models may determine varying levels of organizational efficiency. Critical interventions were proposed: overall, enhanced AIFA data feedback is supported by 85% of the sample; regionally, strengthened communication with local institutions and centralized planning are recommended (mean score 3.2/4); locally, enhanced digitalization of reporting systems may address operational inefficiencies for clinicians and hospital pharmacists (mean score 3.4/4). Conclusion: This analysis contributed to a better awareness of the current FFI management process through a multi-level and multi-professional methodology. Partial return of data, potential distortions of a fund’s allocation based on usage, multiplication of accounting processes, and regional variability in healthcare governance provide a foundation for targeted improvement interventions and to direct future research.

Global & Regional Health Technology AssessmentVol. 12(1)
University of Milan (IT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.