Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Study on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Clinicians’ Decisions to Use Clinical Prediction Models

Accessibility, cost, and practical considerations, such as ease of use and clinical utility, were prioritized slightly more than technical validation metrics, such as discrimination and calibration, when deciding to start using a clinical prediction model.Most breast cancer clinicians valued models with clear inputs (e.g., variable definitions, cutoffs) and outputs; few were interested in the exact model specifications.Perceptual or subjective factors, including perceived accuracy and peer acceptability, also influenced model adoption but were secondary to practical considerations.Sociodemographic variables, such as clinical specialization and hospital setting, influenced the importance of factors for model use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MDM Policy & Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683251328377
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Study on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Clinicians’ Decisions to Use Clinical Prediction Models

Annelies H. Boekhout, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Ellen G. Engelhardt, Mary Ann E. Binuya et al.
MDM Policy & Practice
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Study on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Clinicians’ Decisions to Use Clinical Prediction Models

Annelies H. Boekhout, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Ellen G. Engelhardt, Mary Ann E. Binuya, Sabine C. Linn
article en

Abstract

Accessibility, cost, and practical considerations, such as ease of use and clinical utility, were prioritized slightly more than technical validation metrics, such as discrimination and calibration, when deciding to start using a clinical prediction model.Most breast cancer clinicians valued models with clear inputs (e.g., variable definitions, cutoffs) and outputs; few were interested in the exact model specifications.Perceptual or subjective factors, including perceived accuracy and peer acceptability, also influenced model adoption but were secondary to practical considerations.Sociodemographic variables, such as clinical specialization and hospital setting, influenced the importance of factors for model use.

MDM Policy & PracticeVol. 10(1)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Health~Holland
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Study on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Clinicians’ Decisions to Use Clinical Prediction Models — Annelies H. Boekhout, Marjanka K. Schmidt, et al. · MDM Policy & Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS