Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China

Memorial architectural cultural heritage imbues a nation’s essence and vitality. The public interest litigation mechanism effectively shields against infringements on this heritage. Drawing upon the Interest Balance theory, this article employs quantitative statistical analysis and case studies to emphasize the crucial role of the public interest litigation protection mechanism in safeguarding memorial architectural cultural heritage. By examining public interest litigation cases involving the Great Wall’s historical and cultural heritage, this article discusses the interplay between China’s judicial policy preferences and public interest litigation in balancing social, national, economic, and government interests. This study broadens the scope of judicial protection measures for commemorative architectural cultural heritage. It aims to curb risky behaviors that might harm cultural relics, safeguarding the social public interests through public interest litigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04738-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China

Xiao‐Ying Huang, Bowen Yang, Xinmiao Yang
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
8.27
article

Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China

Xiao‐Ying Huang, Bowen Yang, Xinmiao Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Memorial architectural cultural heritage imbues a nation’s essence and vitality. The public interest litigation mechanism effectively shields against infringements on this heritage. Drawing upon the Interest Balance theory, this article employs quantitative statistical analysis and case studies to emphasize the crucial role of the public interest litigation protection mechanism in safeguarding memorial architectural cultural heritage. By examining public interest litigation cases involving the Great Wall’s historical and cultural heritage, this article discusses the interplay between China’s judicial policy preferences and public interest litigation in balancing social, national, economic, and government interests. This study broadens the scope of judicial protection measures for commemorative architectural cultural heritage. It aims to curb risky behaviors that might harm cultural relics, safeguarding the social public interests through public interest litigation.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China — Xiao‐Ying Huang, Bowen Yang, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS